Main Article Content

Authors

In a seminal paper published in 1991 under the title of «Feminist Approaches to International Law» Hillary Charlesworth, Christine Chinkin and Shelley Wright denounced international law as a «Thoroughly gendered system». These authors in fact believe that male domination can be detected both in content and in the structure of a whole series of rules of international law. This paper tests this hypothesis with regard to the discourse and rules of the law of peace and international security. On analysis, especially with regard to Resolution 1325 (2000) and its sequels, feminist theories appear as an engine of rhetorical change, and in addition, in the longer term, practical. On the other hand, these theories show some limitations when they seek to denounce, beyond their denunciation of the
violation of the individual rights of women, and into the «masculinity» of rules that constitute the law against war.

Olivier Corten, Université libre de Bruxelles

Professeur à l’Université libre de Bruxelles, Centre de droit international et de sociologie appliquée au droit international

Corten, O. (2017). Should We See the Masculine Everywhere? Feminist Theories to the Test of the Law of Peace and International Security. ACDI - Anuario Colombiano De Derecho Internacional, 10, 221–260. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/acdi/a.5293

Ouvrages

Bethke Elshtain, J. & Tobias, S. (Ed.), Women, Militarism & War. Essays in History, Politics, and Social Theory, Maryland, Rowman & Littlefield, 1990.

Bethke Elshtain, J., Women and War, Chicago, Univ. Chicago Press, 1987.

Buss D. & Manji A. (Ed.), International Law. Modern Feminist Approaches, Oxford, Hart Publ. 2005.

Charlesworth, H. & Chinkin, C., The Boundaries of International Law. A Feminist Analysis, Manchester, Manchester University Press, 2000.

Charlesworth, H., Sexe, genre et droit international, Paris, Pedone, collection doctrine(s), 2013.

Randolph Higonnet, M., Michel, S., Jenson, J. & Collins Weitz, M., Behind the Lines. Gender and the Two World Wars, New Haven, Yale Univ. Press, 1987.

Ruth H., Women and the Use of Military Force, Boulder & London, Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1993.

Articles

Barnes, K., « The evolution and implementation of UNSCR 1325: an Over-view » in Olonisakin, F., Barnes, K. & Eka, I. (Eds.), Women, Peace and Security. Translating Policy into Practice, New York, Routledge, 2011, pp. 15-34.

Charlesworth, H. & Chinkin, C., « Sex, Gender and September 11 », AJIL, 2002, pp. 600-605.

Charlesworth, H. & Chinkin, C., « The Gender of Jus Cogens », Human Rights Quarterly, 1993, pp. 67-69.

Charlesworth, H., « Alieneting Oscar ? Feminist Analysis of International Law » in D.G. Dallmeyer (Ed.), Reconceiving Reality: Women and International Law, Washington, ASIL, 1993, pp. 1-18.

Charlesworth, H., « Feminist Critiques of International Law and their Critics », Thirld World Legal Studies, 1994, pp. 1-16.

Charlesworth, H., « Feminist Methods in International Law », AJIL, 1999, pp. 379-394.

Charlesworth, H., « Feminist Reflections on the Responsibility to Protect », Global Responsibility to Protect, 2010, pp. 232-249.

Charlesworth, H., « The sex of the State in International Law » in N. Naf-fine & R. Owens (Eds.), Sexing the Subject of Law, Sidney, Law Book Co, 1997, pp. 251-268.

Charlesworth, H., « Women and International Law », Australian Feminist Studies, 1994, pp. 115-128.

Charlesworth, H., Chinkin, C. & Wright, S., « Feminist Approaches to International Law », AJIL, 1991, pp. 613-645.

Charleworth, H., « The Missing Voice: Woman and the War in Iraq », Oregon Rev. I. L., 2005, pp. 5-15.

Chinkin, C. & Charlesworth, H., « Building Women into Peace: the inter-national legal framework », Thirld World Quarterly, 2006, pp. 937-957.

Chinkin, C., « A Gendered Perspective to the international use of force », Australian YIL, 1992, pp. 279-293.

Engle, K., « Calling in the Troops: The Uneasy Relationship among Women’s Rights, Human Rights and Humanitarian Intervention », Harvard Human Rights Journal, 2007, vol. 20, pp. 189-226.

Gardam, J. G., « Femmes, droits de l’homme et droit international hu-manitaire », Revue internationale de la Croix Rouge, 1998, pp. 449-462.

Haq, K., « Human Security for Women » in Tehranian, M. (Ed.), Worlds Apart: Human Security and Global Governance, London, I.B.Tauris Publishers, 1999, pp. 1-12.

Jones, J. R. W, « Composition of the Court » in Cassese, A., Gaeta, P., Jones, John R. W. (Ed.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Oxford, OUP, 2002, pp. 235-267.

Krill, F., « La protection de la femme dans le droit international humanitaire », Revue internationale de la Croix Rouge, 1985, pp. 343-370.

MacKinnon, C. A., « Women’s September 11th: Rethinking The Interna-tional Law of Conflict », Harvard I. L. Jnal, 2006, pp. 9-14.

Orford, A., « Feminism, Imperialism and the Mission of International Law », Nordic JIL, 2002, pp. 275-296.

Orford, A., « Muscular Humanitarianism: Reading the Narratives of the New Interventionism », EJIL, 1999, pp. 679-711.

Otto, D., « The Security Council’s Alliance of Gender Legitimacy: The Symbolic Capital of Resolution 1325 » in Charlesworth, H. & Coi-caud, J.-M. (Ed.), Faultines of International Legitimacy, Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010, pp. 239-276.

Ubeda-Saillard, M., « Article 8 » in Cot, J.P., Forteau M., Pellet A. (Dir.), La Charte des Nations Unies, 3ème éd., Paris, Economica, 2005, pp. 603-630.

Von Schorlemer, S. « Article 8 » in Simma, B. et al. (Ed.), The Charter of the United Nations, 3nd ed., Oxford, OUP, 2012, pp. 416-444.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.