Main Article Content

Authors

The self-produced housing is clearly an "ar­ chitecture" that works. The occupation with ownership is also a highly desired possession benveen the poor people of third world cit­ies. The governments of the majority of poor countries have stimulated the ownership of the self-constructed housing. But, What do really gain the poor farnilies of own sW-P? As compared with the housing of the rich people, the housing of the self-produced settlements are rarely sold. If a limited mar­ ket for this type of housing exists, the priéing of capital should be limited and henceforth it is probably that the poor will lose as com­ pared to the rich. If the poor cannot sold his self-produced housing that is consolidated, what will they do with them? The author in­ tend to answer sorne of this questions with the help of research done in the self-produced suburbs of Bogota Colombia. He condudes in general manner, that the ownership of bousing in self-produced settlements does not offer the same advantages the ownership that is loeated in high, income areas in rela­tion to the price of capital.

Gilbert, A. (2017). ¿una casa es para siempre? Movilidad residencial y propiedad de la vivienda en los asentamientos autoproducidos. Territorios, (6), 51–73. Retrieved from https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/territorios/article/view/5652

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.