Aplicación de técnicas de MCDM en la evaluación del desempeño bancario
una revisión sistemática de la literatura

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/economia/a.15850

Barra lateral del artículo

Preprint

Publicado: jul 15, 2026
Número: Vol. 28 Núm. 2 (2025)
Sección Artículos


Contenido principal del artículo

Autores/as

  Priya Das
Tripura University
  Ankur Sarkar
Tripura University
  Subir Kumar Sen
Tripura University

Resumen

Este estudio revisa sistemáticamente la aplicación de técnicas de toma de decisiones multicriterio (MCDM, por sus siglas en inglés) en la evaluación del desempeño bancario, utilizando el marco PRISMA y un enfoque de mapeo de brechas de evidencia. Tras examinar 1.546 artículos de SCOPUS, Web of Science y Google Scholar, se identificaron 68 trabajos relevantes. Los hallazgos revelan que la mayoría de los estudios emplean una combinación de técnicas MCDM, destacando AHP y TOPSIS como los métodos más utilizados. La revisión indica, además, un predominio de la selección de criterios independientes de marcos específicos y de indicadores de desempeño financiero, mientras que los marcos multidimensionales estructurados —como CAMEL/CAMELS y el Cuadro de Mando Integral (BSC)— reciben una atención comparativamente limitada. Asimismo, la literatura se concentra geográficamente en unos pocos países, particularmente en Turquía. El estudio identifica oportunidades para futuras investigaciones en áreas como la evaluación basada en marcos, la integración de indicadores no financieros y ESG, el análisis de robustez de las clasificaciones MCDM y la aplicación en un ámbito geográfico más amplio.

Biografía del autor/a

Priya Das, Tripura University

Research Scholar, Department of Commerce 

Ankur Sarkar, Tripura University

Research Scholar, Department of Commerce 

Subir Kumar Sen, Tripura University

Professor, Department of Commerce 

Cómo citar
Das, P., Sarkar, A., & Sen, S. K. (2026). Aplicación de técnicas de MCDM en la evaluación del desempeño bancario: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Revista De Economía Del Rosario, 28(2), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/economia/a.15850
Referencias bibliográfica

Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, R., Elhoseny, M., Abouhawash, M., Nam, Y., & AbdelAziz, N. M. (2021). EfFcient mcdm model for evaluating the performance of commercial banks: A case study. Computers, Materials and Continua, 67(3), 2729-2746. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2021.015316

Akbarei, N., Monfard, M. V., &Sarfi, E. (2020). The performance evaluation of banks using balanced scorecards, fuzzy AHP, and fuzzy TOPSIS techniques, as well as offering solutions to performance improvement of banks. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 35(2), 204-224. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2020.110169

Akkoc, S., & Vatansever, K. (2013). Fuzzy performance evaluation with AHP and Topsis methods: evidence from Turkish banking sector after the global financial crisis. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 6(11), 53-74.

Amile, M., Sedaghat, M., &Poorhossein, M. (2013). Performance Evaluation of Banks using Fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS, Case study: State-owned Banks, Partially Private and Private Banks in Iran. Caspian Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2(3).

Atukalp, M. E. (2021). Determining the relationship between stock return and financial performance: an analysis on Turkish deposit banks. Journal of Applied Statistics, 48(13-15), 2643-2657. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2020.1849056

Baydaş, M., & Elma, O. E. (2021). An objective criteria proposal for comparing MCDM and weighting methods in financial performance measurement: An application in Borsa Istanbul. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(2), 257-279. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame210402257b

Beheshtinia, M. A., & Omidi, S. (2017). A hybrid MCDM approach for performance evaluation in the banking industry. Kybernetes, 46(8), 1386-1407. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-03-2017-0105

Bozdoğan, T., Odabas, A., &Shegiwal, A. H. (2021). Analysis of financial performance of foreign banks with branches in Turkey by TOPSIS and ELECTRE methods. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 5(2), 1049-1067. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.871031

Çakali, K. R. (2022). Performance evaluation of deposit banks with financial ratios: Use objective and subjective criteria weighting methods (Combined entropy-SWARA based EDAS method). Alanya Akademik Bakış, 6(2), 2351-2377. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1056754

Canakcıoglu, M. (2019). Evaluation of the banking performance of the Balkan countries with an integrated MCDM approach consists of Entropy and OCRA techniques. Economy & Business Journal, 13(1), 341-366. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1056754

Chai, J., Liu, J. N., & Ngai, E. W. (2013). Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic literature review. Expert systems with applications, 40(10), 3872-3885. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.12.040

Chakraborty, S., Raut, R. D., Rofin, T. M., & Chakraborty, S. (2023). A comprehensive and systematic review of multicriteria decision-making methods and applications in healthcare. Healthcare Analytics, p. 4, 100232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.health.2023.100232

Charnes A, Cooper WW (1961). Management models and industrial applications of linear programming. Wiley, New York. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.4.1.38

Chaudhuri, T., & Ghosh, I. (2015). Application of multicriteria decision-making models in regulatory evaluation of commercial banks in India and their consistency with public perception. Available at SSRN 2546647. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2546647

Chitnis, A., & Vaidya, O. S. (2018). Efficiency ranking method using SFA and TOPSIS (ERM-ST): the case of Indian banks. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(2), 471-488. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-08-2016-0126

Chowdhury, P., & Paul, S. K. (2020). Applications of MCDM methods in research on corporate sustainability: A systematic literature review. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(2), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2019-0284

Dash, M. (2017). A model for bank performance measurement integrating multivariate factor structure with multicriteria PROMETHEE methodology. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 9(1), 310–332. https://doi.org/10.5296/ajfa.v9i1.11073

Demir, G. (2022). Analysis of the financial performance of the deposit banking sector in the COVID-19 period with LMAW-DNMA methods. International Journal of Insurance and Finance, 2(2), 17–36. https://doi.org /10.52898/ijif.2022.7

Derbali, A. (2021). Determinants of the performance of Moroccan banks. Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 1(1), 102–117. https://doi.org /10.1108/JBSED-01-2021-0003

Dhurkari, R. K. (2022). MCDM methods: Practical difficulties and future directions for improvement. RAIRO-Operations Research, 56(4), 2221-2233. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2022060

Dincer, H., Hacioglu, U., Tatoglu, E., & Delen, D. (2019). Developing a hybrid analytics approach to measure the efficiency of deposit banks. Journal of Business Research, 104, 131-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.035

Dogan, M., & Kevser, M. (2022). Comparing the Financial Performance of Islamic Banks in 10 Countries: New Evidence Using Entropy and WASPAS Methods. Economics, 9(2), 197-210. https://doi.org/10.18488/29.v9i2.3110

Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2015). A multicriteria approach to bank rating. Bisdorf, R., Dias (eds), Evaluation and Decision Models with Multiple Criteria, 563-587. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46816-6

Doumpos, M., & Zopounidis, C. (2002). Multicriteria classification methods in financial and banking decisions. International Transactions in Operational Research, 9(5), 567-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-3995.00374

Doumpos, M., &Zopounidis, C. (2010). A multicriteria decision support system for bank rating. Decision support systems, 50(1), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.07.002

Gavurova, B., Belas, J., Kocisova, K., & Kliestik, T. (2017). Comparison of selected methods for performance evaluation of Czech and Slovak commercial banks. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(5), 852-876. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1371637

Gilbert, R. A., & Wheelock, D. C. (2007). Measuring commercial bank profitability: Proceed with caution. Networks Financial Institute Working Paper, (2007-WP), p. 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1060341

Ginevičius, R., & Podviezko, A. (2013). The evaluation of financial stability and soundness of Lithuanian banks. Economic research-Ekonomskaistraživanja, 26(2), 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2013.11517616

Gökalp, F. (2015). Comparing the financial performance of banks in Turkey by using the Promethee method. EgeStratejikAraştırmalarDergisi, 6(1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.18354/esam.90895

Grossman, R. S. (1993). The macroeconomic consequences of bank failures under the national banking system. Explorations in Economic History, 30(3), 294-320. https://doi.org/10.1006/exeh.1993.1012

Gupta, S., Mathew, M., Gupta, S., & Dawar, V. (2021). Benchmarking the private sector banks in India using the MCDM approach. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(2), e2409. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2409

Gupta, S., Mathew, M., Syal, G., & Jain, J. (2021). A hybrid MCDM approach for evaluating the financial performance of public sector banks in India. International Journal of Business Excellence, 24(4), 481–501. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2021.117648

Guru, S., & Mahalik, D. K. (2019). A comparative study on performance measurement of Indian public sector banks using AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-grey relational analysis. Opsearch, 56(4), 1213-1239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-019-00411-1

Guru, S., & Mahalik, D. K. (2021). Ranking the performance of Indian public sector banks using analytic hierarchy process and technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 11(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2021.112246

Hasan, D., Ümit, H. A. C. I. O. Ğ. L. U., & Serhat, Y. Ü. K. S. E. L. (2016). Performance assessment of deposit banks with CAMELS analysis using fuzzy ANP-Moora approaches and an application on the Turkish banking sector. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 6(2), 32–56. 10.5958/2249-7307.2016.00009.8

Ho, C. T. (2004). Performance evaluation of Australia's central banks. Asian Review of Accounting, 12(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060771

Ic, Y. T., Celik, B., Kavak, S., & Baki, B. (2021). Development of a multicriteria decision-making model for comparing the performance of Turkish commercial banks. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 18(2), 250-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-05-2020-0083

Ic, Y. T., Yurdakul, M., & Pehlivan, E. (2022). Developing a hybrid financial performance measurement model for Turkish commercial banks using AHP and DOE methods. Soft Computing, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-06589-1

Jakšić, M., Moljević, S., Aleksić, A., Misita, M., Arsovski, S., Tadić, D., &Mimović, P. (2016). Fuzzy approach in ranking of banks according to financial performances. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6169586

Jaouad, E., & Lahsen, O. (2018). Factors affecting bank performance: empirical evidence from Morocco. European Scientific Journal, 14(34), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2018.v14n34p255

Karamitsos, I., Albarhami, S., & Apostolopoulos, C. (2019). Tweet Sentiment Analysis (TSA) for cloud providers using classification algorithms and latent semantic analysis. Journal of Data Analysis and Information Processing, 7(04), 276.

Keshavarz, E., Ftahikenari, M., Rohani, A., & Bagheri, S. M. (2014). Performance evaluation of banks using a balanced scorecard. International Journal of Business Excellence, 7(3), 371-393. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2014.060781

Kuhn, H. W., A. W. Tucker (1951). Nonlinear programming, Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, California, 5, 481-492.

Kumar, P., & Sharma, D. (2023). Benchmarking the financial performance of Indian commercial banks by a hybrid MCDM approach. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 15(3), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2023.134147

Kumar, P., & Sharma, D. (2024). Prioritizing the financial performance of Indian private sector banks by a hybrid MCDM approach. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 16(4), 490–511. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2024.137145

Laha, S., & Biswas, S. (2019). Hybrid unsupervised learning and multicriteria decision-making approach for performance evaluation of Indian banks. Accounting, 5(4), 169-184. 10.5267/j.ac.2018.11.001

Lak Kamari, M., Isvand, H., &Alhuyi Nazari, M. (2020). Applications of multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods in renewable energy development: A review. Renewable Energy Research and Applications, 1(1), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.22044/rera.2020.8541.1006

Lin, A. J., & Chang, H. Y. (2019). Business sustainability performance evaluation for Taiwanese banks—A hybrid multiple-criteria decision-making approach. Sustainability, 11(8), 2236. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082236

Mandic, K., Delibasic, B., Knezevic, S., & Benkovic, S. (2014). Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through applying the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods. Economic modeling, 43, 30-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2014.07.036

Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Khalifah, Z., Jusoh, A., & Nor, K. M. (2016). Multiple criteria decision-making techniques in transportation systems: A systematic review of the state of the art literature. Transport, 31(3), 359-385. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1121517

Marjanović, I., & Popović, Ž. (2020). MCDM approach for assessment of financial performance of Serbian banks. Business Performance and Financial Institutions in Europe: Business Models and Value Creation Across European Industries, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57517-5_5

Özari, Ç., & Can, E. N. (2023). Financial Performance Evaluating and Ranking Approach for Banks in Bist Sustainability Index Using Topsis and K-Means Clustering Method. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12(1), 34-50. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0004

Ozcalici, M., & Bumin, M. (2020). An integrated multicriteria decision-making model with self-organizing maps is used to assess the performance of publicly traded banks in Borsa Istanbul. Applied Soft Computing, 90, 106166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106166

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372.

Puri, J., & Verma, M. (2020). Integrated data envelopment analysis and multicriteria decision-making ranking approach based on peer-evaluations and subjective preferences: a case study in the banking sector. Data Technologies and Applications, 54(4), 551–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/DTA-01-2020-0003

Radhakrishnan, S., Erbis, S., Isaacs, J. A., &Kamarthi, S. (2017). Novel keyword co-occurrence network-based methods to foster systematic reviews of scientific literature. PloS one, 12(3), e0172778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172778

Rebai, S., Azaiez, M. N., &Saidane, D. (2012). Sustainable performance evaluation of banks using a multi-attribute utility model: an application to French banks. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2, 363-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00098-6

Reig-Mullor, J., Brotons-Martinez, J. M., & Sansalvador-Selles, M. E. (2020). A novel approach to improve the bank ranking process: an empirical study in Spain. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 38(5), 5323-5331. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179626

Robinson, K. A., Saldanha, I. J., & Mckoy, N. A. (2011). Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(12), 1325-1330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.009

Roman, A., & Şargu, A. C. (2013). Analyzing the financial soundness of the commercial banks in Romania: an approach based on the camel's framework. Procedia economics and finance, 6, 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(13)00192-5

Saini, N., & Khanduja, D. (2019). Financial performance evaluation using made approaches in Indian banks. In Advances in Interdisciplinary Engineering: Select Proceedings of FLAME 2018 (pp. 439-449). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6577-5_42

Sama, H. R., Kosuri, S. V. K., & Kalvakolanu, S. (2022). Evaluating and ranking the Indian private sector banks—A multicriteria decision‐making approach. Journal of Public Affairs, 22(2), e2419. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2419

Sari, T., &Kayral, İ. E. (2019). Applying a two-stage TOPSIS approach and stepwise regression in evaluating bank performance: evidence from Turkish banks. Banks and Bank Systems, 14(4), 114. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(4).2019.11

Sarigül, S. S., Pınar, A. V. C. I., & Yaşar, E. (2023). Evaluation of the Financial Performance of Deposit Banks Operating in Turkey by Entropy-supported EDAS Method. JOEEP: Journal of Emerging Economies and Policy, 8(1), 239-255.

Seçme, N. Y., Bayrakdaroğlu, A., & Kahraman, C. (2009). Fuzzy performance evaluation in the Turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS. Expert systems with applications, 36(9), 11699-11709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.03.013

Sedaghat, M. (2013). A productivity improvement evaluation model by integrating AHP, TOPSIS, and VIKOR methods under a fuzzy environment (case study: State-owned, partially private, and private banks in Iran). Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 47(1), 235–258.

Shaverdi, M., Akbari, M., &Tafti, S. F. (2011). Combining fuzzy MCDM with BSC approach in performance evaluation of Iranian private banking sector. Advances in fuzzy Systems, 2011, 1-12. https://doi.org/ 10.1155/2011/148712

Shen, K. Y., & Tzeng, G. H. (2015). A decision rule-based soft computing model for supporting financial performance improvement of the banking industry. Soft Computing, 19, 859-874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-014-1413-7

Stankevičienė, J., & Mencaitė, E. (2012). The evaluation of bank performance using a multicriteria decision-making model: a case study on Lithuanian commercial banks. Technological and economic development of economy, 18(1), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2012.668373

Stanujkić, D., Đorđević, B., & Đorđević, M. (2013). Comparative analysis of some prominent MCDM methods: A case of ranking Serbian banks. Serbian journal of management, 8(2), 213-241. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm8-3774

Ünlü, U., Yalçın, N., &Avşarlıgil, N. (2022). Analysis of efficiency and productivity of commercial banks in Turkey pre-and during COVID-19 with an integrated MCDM approach. Mathematics, 10(13), 2300. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10132300

Ünvan, Y. A. (2020). Financial performance analysis of banks with TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS approaches. Gazi University Journal of Science, 33(4), 904–923. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.730294

Ünvan, Y. A., & Ergenç, C. (2022). Financial performance analysis with the fuzzy COPRAS and entropy-COPRAS approaches. Computational Economics, 59(4), 1577-1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-021-10143-4

Uzun, B., Ozsahin, I., Agbor, V. O., &Ozsahin, D. U. (2021). Theoretical aspects of multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods. In Applications of Multicriteria Decision-Making Theories in Healthcare and Biomedical Engineering (pp. 3-40). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824086-1.00002-5

Wanke, P., Azad, M. A. K., Yazdi, A. K., Birau, F. R., & Spulbar, C. M. (2022). Revisiting camels rating system and the performance of Asean banks: a comprehensive mcdm/z-numbers approach. IEEE Access, 10, 54098-54109. 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3171339

Wanke, P., Kalam Azad, M. A., Barros, C. P., & Hadi‐Vencheh, A. (2016). Predicting performance in ASEAN banks: an integrated fuzzy MCDM–neural network approach. Expert Systems, 33(3), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12144

Wu, H. Y., Tzeng, G. H., & Chen, Y. H. (2009). A fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating banking performance based on Balanced Scorecard. Expert systems with applications, 36(6), 10135-10147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.005

Yazdi, A. K., Hanne, T., & Gómez, J. C. O. (2020). Evaluating the performance of Colombian banks by hybrid multicriteria decision-making methods. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 21(6), 1707-1730. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2020.11758

Yazdi, A. K., Spulbar, C., Hanne, T., & Birau, R. (2022). Ranking performance indicators related to banking by using hybrid multicriteria methods in an uncertain environment: A case study for Iran under COVID-19 conditions. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 10(1), 166-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642583.2022.2052996

Zimmermann, H. J., & Sebastian, H. J. (1995, March). Intelligent system design supported by fuzzy-multi-criteria decision-making and/or evolutionary algorithms. In Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems. (Vol. 1, pp. 367-374). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZY.1995.409705

Estadísticas de consulta

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Métricas de publicación

0




 

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.