Perceptions of Connectedness: Public Access Computing and Social Inclusion in Colombia

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))

Published: Jan 13, 2012
Issue: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2012): (Jan-Jun) Digital Media and Political Participation
Section Estudios (Studies)


Keywords: Colombia Libraries relationships social networks

Main Article Content

Authors

Luis Fernando Barón Porras
Universidad Icesi, Universidad de Washington
Ricardo Gomez
Universidad de Washington

Abstract

Of all the benefits public access computers (PAC) offer users, one stands apart: stronger personal connections with friends and family. A closer look at the results of a qualitative study among users of libraries, telecenters, and cybercafés in Colombia, South America, shows that social media and personal relationships can also have an important community and sociopolitical dimension. By fostering a sense of belonging and connectedness to community and to a larger world, PAC usage often leads to feelings of empowerment and development of social capital, two intangible factors that are critical for community development. This study used a mixed-methods approach, combining surveys and interviews in five regions of the country, to uncover the benefits of PAC for underserved communities. Its findings contribute new insight about the impact of information and communication technologies (ICT) on community development and social inclusion.

How to Cite
Barón Porras, L. F., & Gomez, R. (2012). Perceptions of Connectedness: Public Access Computing and Social Inclusion in Colombia. Anuario Electrónico De Estudios En Comunicación Social "Disertaciones", 5(1), 105–128. Retrieved from https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/disertaciones/article/view/3888
References

Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept.

[Review]. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), p.17-40.

Angel, D. (Ed.). (1998). Señales de Humo: Panorama de la Televisión Local y

Comunitaria en Colombia. Bogota: CINEP, Fundación Social.

Becker, S., Crandall, M. D., Fisher, K. E., Kinney, B., Landry, C., & Rocha, A.

(2010). Opportunity for All: How the American Public Benefits from Internet Access

at U.S. Libraries. Washington DC: Institute of Museum and Library Services.

Campbell, C., & Jovchelovitch, S. (2000). Health, community and development:

Towards a social psychology of participation. [Article]. Journal of Community &

Applied Social Psychology, 10 (4), p.255-270.

Casasbuenas, J. (2007). Gestión de Conocimiento e Intercambio de Experiencias

entre Telecentros Comunitarios y Telecentros Compartel en Colombia. Ponencia

presentada en el Encuentro Latinoamericano de Telecentros e Inclusión Social

, Santiago de Chile.

Chamberlin, J. (1997). A working definition of empowerment. Psychiatric

Rehabilitation Journal, 20 (4), p.43-46.

Coleman, J. S. (1988). SOCIAL CAPITAL IN THE CREATION OF HUMANCAPITAL.

[Article]. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95-S120.

Colnodo, APC, Corporación Colombia Digital, & Observatorio de Sociedad

Gobierno y Tecnologías de Información - Observatics. (2007). Resultados consulta

sobre Políticas de Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (TIC) en Colombia.

Doctor, R. D. (1991). Information Technologies And Social Equity - Confronting

The Revolution. [Article]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,

(3), p.216-228.

Gomez, R. (2010). Structure and Flexibility in Global Research Design:

Methodological Choices in Landscape Study of Public Access in 25 Countries.

Performance Measurement and Metrics, 11 (3), p. 231-258.

Gurstein, M. (2008). What is community informatics (and why does it matter)?

Milano: Polimetrica.

Kabeer, N. (1999). Resources, agency, achievements: Reflections on the

measurement of women's empowerment. [Proceedings Paper]. Development and

Change, 30 (3), p.435-464.

Mehra, B., Merkel, C., & Bishop, A. P. (2004). The internet for empowerment of

minority and marginalized users. New Media Society, 6 (6), p.781-802.

Melkote, S. R., & Steeves, H. L. (2001). Communication for Development in the

Third World. Theory and Practice for Empowerment (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks:

Sage.

Miller, D. B., & Rudnick, L. (2010). The case for situated theory in modern

peacebuilding practice. J. Peacebuild. Dev. Journal of Peacebuilding and

Development, 5 (2), p.62-74.

Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. Nueva

York: Public Affairs.

Philipsen, G. (2009). University of Washington Cen-ter for Local Strate-gies

Research. Seattle: University of Washington.

Putnam, D. R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy.

Princeton,J: Princeton University Press.

Putnam, D. R. (1995). Bowling alone. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.

Sey, A., & Fellows, M. (2009). Literature Review on the Impact of Public Access to

Information and Communication Technologies. Seattle: Center for Information &

Society, University of Washington.

Unwin, T. (Ed.). (2009). ICT4D: Information and Communication Technology for

Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital

Divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a

theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory & Society, 27 (2).

Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations.

[Article]. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23 (5), p. 581-599.

Query Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Publcation metrics

1007 450




 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.