Conteúdo do artigo principal

Autores

Ao adotar a postura filosófica da física do “republicanismo causal”, este artigo aborda a causalidade como uma ferramenta interpretativa para dar sentido às relações entre as coisas no mundo. Embora vários linguistas e filósofos realistas tenham enfatizado a relevância da linguagem para a ciência como uma interpretação do que é real, as explicações filosófico-realistas sobre causalidade nas relações internacionais frequentemente negligenciam a importância da linguagem e da interpretação para fornecer explicações causais. Para justificar o caráter interpretativo da causalidade, este artigo oferece um exemplo de análise realista crítica do poder causal das ideias em um caso de busca por regionalismo, demonstrando que incorporar uma visão republicanista causal em explicações realistas causais pode melhorar a aprimorar a formulação de explicações causais, sem abrir mão de sua concepção de causalidade carregada de pressupostos realistas.

Prieto, G. C. (2026). Construindo explicações realistas causais: republicanismo causal e causalidade como interpretação nas relações internacionais. Desafíos, 38(Especial), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.15389

Banta, B. (2012). Analysing discourse as a causal mechanism. European Journal of International Relations, 19(2), 379–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111428970 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111428970

Beebee, H. (2007). Hume on Causation: The Projectivist Interpretation. In H. Price & R. Corry (Eds.), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell’s Republic Revisited (Ch. 9). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0009

Bhaskar, R. (2008). A Realist Theory of Science (2nd ed.). Verso.

Bhaskar, R. (1998). The Possibility of Naturalism. A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Campbell, D. (1992). Writing Security. United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. University of Minnesota Press.

Cartwright, N. (1979). Causal Laws and Effective Strategies. Nouˆs, 13(4), 419–437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2215337

Davidson, D. (1963). Actions, Reasons and Causes. The Journal of Philosophy, 60(23), 685–700. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2023177

Drulák, P. (2004). Metaphors Europe Lives by: Language and Institutional Change of the European Union (EUI Working Paper SPS 2004/15). European University Institute.

Drulák, P. (2006). Motion, Container and Equilibrium: Metaphors in the Discours about European Integration. European Journal of International Relations, 12(4), 499–531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106069322

Eagle, A. (2007). Pragmatic Causation. In H. Price & R. Corry (Eds.), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell’s Republic Revisited (Ch.7). Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0007

Elder-Vass, D. (2011). ‘The Causal Power of Discourse’. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00449.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00449.x

Epstein, C. (2013). Constructivism or the eternal return of universals in International Relations. Why returning to language is vital to prolonging the owl’s flight. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 499–519. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494669

Fairclough, N., Jessop, B., & Sayer A. (2004). ‘Critical Realism and Semiosis. In J. Joseph & J.M. Roberts (Eds). Realism, Discourse and Deconstruction (Ch.2). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/aleth.v5i1.2

Gibran, B. (2014). Causal Realism in the Philosophy of Mind. Essays in Philosophy, 15(2), 299–313. https://doi.org/10.7710/1526-0569.1509 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7710/1526-0569.1509

Hanson, N.R. (1958). Patterns of Discover. Cambridge University Press.

Herrmann, R.K. & Lebow, R.N. (Eds.). (2004). Ending the Cold War. Interpretations, Causation and the Study of International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403982810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403982810

Hitchcock, C. (2007). What Russell Got Right. In H. Price & R. Corry (Eds.), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell’s Republic Revisited (Ch.3). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0003

Hume, D. (2007). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Edited with an Introduction and Notes by Peter Millican. Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/owc/9780199549900.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/owc/9780199549900.001.0001

Hume, D. (2007). A Treatise of Human Nature. A Critical Edition (D. F. Norton & M. J. Norton, Eds., Vol. 1: Texts). Clarendon Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00032872

Jackson, P.T. (2011). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203843321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203843321

Jackson, P.T. (2017). Causal claims and causal explanation in international studies. Journal of International Relations and Development, 20(4), 689–716. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2016.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2016.13

Joseph, J. and Roberts, J.M. (2003). Realism Discourse and Deconstruction. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203300473 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203300473

Kim, J. (1981). Causes as Explanations: A Critique. Theory and Decision, 13, 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126965

Kim, J. (1982). Psycophysical Supervenience. Philosophical Studies, 41, 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353523 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353523

Krebs, R.R. and Jackson, P.T. (2007). Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074284 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074284

Kurki, M. (2008). Causation in International Relations. Reclaiming Causal Analysis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491481

Kurki, M. & Suganami, H. (2012). Towards the politics of causal explanation: a reply to the critics of causal inquiries. International Theory, 4(3), 400–429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971912000127

Kutach, D. (2007). The Physical Foundations of Causation. In H. Price & R. Corry (Eds.), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell’s Republic Revisited (Ch. 12). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0012

Lebow, R.N. (2010). Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835126 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400835126

Lebow, R.N. (2014). Constructing Cause in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107256538 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107256538

Menzies, P. (2007). Causation in Context. In H. Price & R. Corry (Eds.), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality. Russell’s Republic Revisited (Ch. 8). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0008

Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1937571

Newman, J. (2020). Critical realism, critical discourse analysis, and the morphogenetic approach. Journal of Critical Realism, 19(5), 433–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1758986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1758986

Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science. Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation. Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1937571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1937571

Neeleman, A. & van de Koot, H. (2010). The Linguistic Expression of Causation. (UCL Working Papers in Linguistics No. 22, UCLWPL, pp. 78–100). University College of London. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/pals/research/linguistics/publications/wpl/10papers/Neelman201/

Norton, J.D. (2003). Causation as Folk Science. Philosopher’s Imprint, 3(4), 1–22.

Onuf, N.G. (2013). Making Sense, Making Worlds. Constructivism in social theory and international relations. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203096710 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203096710

Price, H. and Corry, R. (2007). A Case for Causal Republicanism? In H. Price & R. Corry (Eds.), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell’s Republic Revisited (Ch. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0001

Price, H. (2007). Causal Perspectivalism. In H. Price & R. Corry (Eds.), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell’s Republic Revisited (Ch. 10). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.001.0001

Prieto, G.C. (2013). The Role of Collective Identity and Regional Institutions in the Andean Community (Doctoral Thesis, University of Manchester). https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/studentTheses/the-role-of-collective-identity-and-regional-institutions-in-the-/

Prieto, G.C. (2015). Collective Identity in the Andean Community: An Institutional Account. Papel Político, 20(2), 585-604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.papo20-2.ciac

Prieto, G.C. (2016). Identidad Colectiva e Instituciones Regionales en la Comunidad Andina. Un Análisis Constructivista. Editorial Javeriana. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv86dg0h DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv86dg0h

Prieto, G.C. (2020). Causation in Realist Constructivism: Interactionality, Emergence, and the Need for Interpretation. In J.S. Barkin (Ed.), The Social Construction of State Power. Applying Realist Constructivism (Ch. 2). Bristol University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56687/9781529209846-003

https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529209839.003.0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529209839.003.0002

Reinhart, T. (2000). The Theta System: Syntactic Realization of Verbal Concepts. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics. MIT Press.

Suganami, H. (2013). Causation-in-the-world: A Contribution to Meta- theory of IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 623–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813484185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829813484185

Suganami, H. & Humphreys, A. R. C. (Eds.). (2017). Problems of causation in world politics. Journal of International Relations and Development, 20(4), 659–825. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2016.14

Walter, J. & Helmig, J. (2005). Metaphors as Agents of Signification. Towards a Discursive Analysis of Metaphors. Paper presented at the ECPR Workshop on Metaphors in Political Science, Granada, Spain.

Wendt, A. (1987). The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory. International Organization, 41(3), 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002751X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002751X

Wendt, A. (1998). On constitution and causation in International Relations. Review of International Studies, 24(5), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210598001028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210598001028

Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183

Wendt, A. (2015). Quantum Mind and Social Science. Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316005163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316005163

Wight, C. (2006). Agents, Structures and International Relations: Politics as Ontology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491764 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491764

Woodward, J. (2007). Causation with a Human Face. In H. Price & R. Corry (Eds.), Causation, Physics, and the Constitution of Reality: Russell’s Republic Revisited (Ch. 4). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278183.003.0004

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.