Main Article Content

Authors

There is a deep concern of the Governments with respect to the migration issue. While it is moving from being a force generating social, political, and economical transformations, it also represents a challenge to the traditional State which despite its democratic framework, it however does not institutionally favor the implementation of more pluralist models which promote the inclusion of migrants under certain conditions. The obstacle to implementing these models lies not only on the potential results of the new relationships created, but also on the consistent blend of customs and social structures which generate a culture, being the symbolic meaning of the –public and private– identity which provides a purpose to the adaptation and assimilatory process of those migrants. Due to the bipolar effect of the migration, on the one hand it favors the promotion of an institutional flexibility which fosters a more politically plural system on the States’ side, and on the other hand it has boosted the notion of the existence of collective identities alien to nation-wide matters, which compromise the social consistency within a nation-state.

 

Palacios Espinosa, M. del R. (2010). La migración y los nuevos retos para el Estado-nación: relativismo ético y de identidad. Desafíos, 16, 233–254. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.628

Brimelow, Peter. 1995. Alien Nation: common sense about America’s immigration disaster. Random House, New York.

Crush, Jonathan. 2000. The dark side of democracy: migration, xenophobia, and human rights in South Africa, International Migration 6 (38): 103-123.

Dreyfus, Hubert y Ravinov, Paul. 1998. Michel Foucault: Más allá del estructuralismo y la hermenéutica. UNAM, México D.F.

Faist, Thomas. 2000. “Trasnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23 (2), March.

Finsterbusch, Kurt. 1996. Taking sides: clashing views on controversial social issues. 9th ed. Dushkin Publishing Group.

Fukuyama, Francis. 1993. “Immigrants and family values”, Commentary 95 (5), May.

Gelles, Richard & Levine, Ann. 2000. Sociología: con aplicaciones en países de habla hispana. 6ª. edición. Mc Graw Hill, México.

Leal, Alejandra. 2001. “La identidad mixteca en la migración al Norte: el caso del Frente Indígena Oaxaqueño Binacional”, Amérique Latine Histoire et Mémoire (2): Migrations: Guatemala, Mexique, Janvier, consulta del 2 de agosto de 2006, disponible en http://alhim.revues.org/document610.html.

Negri, Antonio & Hardt, Michael. 2000. Imperio. Harvard University Press.

Ong, Aihwa. 1999. Flexible citizenship: the cultural logics of transnationality. Duke University Press, Durham and London.

Ortiz, Vilma & Téllez, Edward. 2003. The Mexican American People a generation later. Sociology, Chicano Studies Research Center, UCLA.

Palacio, Priscila. 2006. “La industrialización nacional y el papel del estado, en el viejo regionalismo latinoamericano y en el nuevo regionalismo abierto americano”, Observatorio de la Economía Latinoamericana (57).

Pew Hispanic Center Survey of U.S. 2005. Latinos. Junio.

Recondo, Gregorio. 1997. Identidad, integración y creación cultural en América Latina. Ediciones Unesco, Buenos Aires.

Sassen, Saskia. 2001. The Global city. Princeton University Press, Princeton and Oxford; Nueva York, Londres, Tokyo.

Stavenhagen, Rodolfo. 2000. Conflictos étnicos y Estado nacional. Siglo XXI. De C.V.; Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades de la UNAM; United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. México.

Suro, Roberto. 2005. “Attitudes toward immigrants and immigration policy: surveys among Latinos in the U.S. and in Mexico”, Pew Hispanic Center, August, pp. 3-4

Wagner, Sarah. 2002. Putting a face on transnationalism: migration, identity , and membership in the transnational city of Johannesburg, Harvard University (May).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.