Alamuddin, A. (2010). Collection of Evidence. In K. A. A. Khan, C. Buisman & C. Gosnell (Eds.), Principles of Evidence in International Criminal Justice (pp. 231-305). Oxford University Press.
Bailey, S. (2014). Article 21(3) of the Rome statute: Plea for clarity. International Criminal Law Review, 14(3), 513-550.
Beltran Montoliu, A. (2018). Judicial impartiality and evidence at the international criminal court. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 4(2), 605-644. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v4i2.159
Chau, P. (2016). Excluding Integrity? Revisiting Non-Consequentialist Justifications for Excluding Improperly Obtained Evidence in Criminal Trials. In J. Hunter, P. Roberts, & S. N. Young & D. Dixon (Eds.), The Integrity of Criminal Process: From Theory into Practice (pp. 267-280). Hart Publishing.
Gless, S. & Macula, L. (2019). Exclusionary Rules—Is It Time for Change?. In S. Gless, & T. Richter (Eds.), Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? (pp. 349-380, Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol. 74). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2_12
Heinze, A. (2020). Private International Criminal Investigations and Integrity. In M. Bergsmo & V. E. Dittrich (Eds.), Integrity in International Justice (pp. 615-738, Nuremberg Academy Series N° 4). Torkel Opsahl Academic EPublisher.
Heinze, A. (2021). Evidence illegally obtained by private investigators and its use before international criminal tribunals. New Criminal Law Review, 24(2), 212-253. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2021.24.2.212
Ho, H. L. (2019). The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence. In S. Gless & T. Ritcher (Eds.), Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? (pp. 283-305, Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol. 74). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2_9
Kremens, K. & Jasinski, W. (2021). Editorial of dossier "admissibility of evidence in criminal process: Between the establishment of the truth, human rights and the efficiency of proceedings". Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 7(1), 15-42. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.537
Krzan, B. (2021). Admissibility of evidence and international criminal justice. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 7(1), 161-188. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.492
Kuczynska, H. (2021). Mechanisms of elimination of undesired evidence from criminal trial: Comparative approach. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 7(1), 43-92. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.473
Lin, Y.H., Wang, S.F., Chen, C.Y., Tsai, T.C. & Tsai, C.M. (2019). The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective. In S. Gless & T. Richter (Eds.), Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? (pp. 131-161, Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol. 74). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2_5
Madden, M. (2014). The Exclusion of improperly obtained evidence at the International Criminal Court: A principled approach to interpreting Article 69(7) of the Rome Statute. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2441403
Panzavolta, M., Mosna, A. & Maes, E. (2022). Streamlining the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence in criminal justice. https://www.fairtrials.org/app/uploads/2022/02/Streamlining_exclusion_KUL.pdf
Penney, S. (2003). Taking Deterrence Seriously: Excluding Unconstitutionally Obtained Evidence Under Section 24(2) of the Charter. McGill Law Journal, 49(1), 105-144. https://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/wp-content/uploads/pdf/6890799-Penney.pdf
Piragoff, D. K. & Clarke, P. (2016). Article 69: Evidence. In O. Triffterer & K. Ambos (Eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary (pp. 1712-1750, 3a ed.). C.H. Beck Hart Publishing Nomos.
Roberts, P., Hunter, J., Young, S. N. M., & Dixon, D. (2016). Introduction: Re-Examining Criminal Process Through the Lens of Integrity. In P. Roberts, J. Hunter, S. N. M. Young & D. Dixon (Eds.), The Integrity of Criminal Process: From Theory into Practice (pp. 1-34). Hart Publishing.
Safferling, C. J. M. (2001). Towards an international criminal procedure. Oxford University Press.
Sheppard, D. (2010). International criminal court and internationally recognized human rights: Understanding article 21(3) of the Rome statute. International Criminal Law Review, 10(1), 43-72. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181209X12584562670811
Slobogin, C. (2013). A comparative perspective on the exclusionary rule in search and seizure cases. Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 13-21. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2247746
Thake, A. M. (2005). The (In)Admissibility of Unlawfully Obtained Evidence at the International Criminal Court. In Hague Yearbook of International Law (pp. 161-190). Brill | Nijhoff. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004354098_007
Turner, J. I. & Weigend, T. (2019). The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview. In S. Gless & T. Ritcher (Eds.), Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? (pp. 255-282, Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, vol. 74). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2_8
Viebig, P. (2016). Illicitly obtained evidence at international criminal court. Asser Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-093-0_9
Weigend, T. (2021). Exclusion without trial? Exclusion of evidence and abbreviated procedures. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 7(1), 247-272. https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.502
Zappalà, S. (2003). Human rights in international criminal proceedings. Oxford University Press.
Zili, M. A. C. (2006). A prova ilícita e o Tribunal Penal Internacional: regras de Admissibilidade [Tese de Doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo]. https://repositorio.usp.br/item/001584688
Jurisprudência
Corte Europeia de Direitos Humanos (CEDH)
Gafgen v. Germany, Julgamento, Grand Chamber, 1 de junho de 2010,
ECHR App. no. 22978/05. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/cfe8d9/pdf/.
Tribunal Penal Internacional – (TPI)
Prosecutor v. Al Hassan Ag Abdoul Aziz Ag Mohamed Ag Mahmoud (Al Hassan)
Public redacted version of ‘Decision on requests related to the submission into evidence of Mr Al Hassan’s statements’, Câmara de Julgamento X, 20 de maio de 2021, ICC-01/12-01/18. https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2021_04698.PDF.
Prosecutor v. Callixte Mbarushimana (Mbarushimana)
Decision on the Confirmation of Charges, Câmara de Julgamento Preliminar I, 16 de dezembro de 2011, ICC-01/04-01/10-465-Red. https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/record.aspx?uri=1286409.
Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen (Ongwen)
Decision on Request to Admit Evidence Preserved Under Article 56 of the Statute, Câmara de Julgamento IX, 10 de agosto de 2016, ICC-02/04-01/15-520. https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-02/04-01/15-520.
Prosecutor v. Germain Katanga
Decision on the Joinder of the Cases against Germain Katanga and Mathieu Ngudjolo Chui, Câmara de Julgamento Preliminar I, 10 de março de 2008, ICC-01/04-01/07-257. https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/CourtRecords/CR2008_01129.PDF.
Decision on the Confirmation of Charges, Câmara de Julgamento Preliminar I, 14 de outubro de 2008, ICC-01/04-01/07-717. https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/record.aspx?uri=571253.
Decision on the "Prosecution's Urgent Application to Be Permitted to Present as Incriminating Evidence Transcripts and translations of Videos and Video DRCOTP-1042-0006 pursuant to Regulation 35 and Request for Redactions (ICC-01/04-01/07-1260)”, Câmara de Julgamento II, 29 de julho de 2009, ICC-01/04-01/07-1336. https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/record.aspx?uri=717126.
Decision on the Prosecutor's Bar Table Motions, Câmara de Julgamento II, 17 de dezembro de 2010, ICC-01/04-01/07-2635. https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/record.aspx?uri=987504.
Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo (Bemba)
Decision on the admission into evidence of materials contained in the prosecution's list of evidence, Câmara de Julgamento III, 19 de novembro de 2010, ICC-01/05-01/08-1022. https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/CourtRecords/CR2010_10652.PDF.
Prosecutor v. Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo Aimé Kilolo Musamba, Jean-Jacques Mangenda Kabongo, Fidèle Babala Wandu And Narcisse Arido (Bemba et al.)
Decision on Kilolo Defence Motion for Inadmissibility of Material, Câmara de Julgamento VII, 16 de setembro de 2015, ICC-01/05-01/13-1257. https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/record.aspx?uri=2060859.
Decision on Request to declare telephone intercepts inadmissible, Câmara de Julgamento VII, 24 de setembro de 2015, ICC-01/05-01/13-1284. https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-01/05-01/13-1284.
Decision on Bemba and Arido Defence Requests to Declare Certain Materials Inadmissible, Câmara de Julgamento VII, 30 de outubro de 2015, ICC-01/05-01/13-1432. https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/record.aspx?uri=2125465.
Corrigendum of public redacted version of Decision on Prosecution Rule 68(2) and (3) Requests, Câmara de Julgamento VII, 15 de novembro de 2015, ICC-01/05-01/13-1478-Red-Corr. https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/record.aspx?uri=2145405.
Decision on Narcisse Arido's Request to Preclude the Prosecution from Using Private Communications, Câmara de Julgamento VII, 10 de março de 2016, ICC-01/05-01/13-1711. https://www.legal-tools.org/doc/7f119c/pdf/.
Decision on Requests to Exclude Dutch Intercepts and Call Data Records. Câmara de Julgamento VII, 26 de abril de 2016, ICC-01/05-01/13-1855. https://www.icc-cpi.int/court-record/icc-01/05-01/13-1855.
Decision on Requests to Exclude Western Union Documents and other Evidence Pursuant to Article 69(7), Câmara de Julgamento VII, 29 de abril de 2016, ICC-01/05-01/13-1854. https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-01/05-01/13-1854.
Decision on Request in Response to Two Austrian Decisions, Câmara de Julgamento VII, 14 de julho de 2016, ICC-01/05-01/13-1948. https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-01/05-01/13-1948.
Public Redacted Version of Judgment pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute, Câmara de Julgamento VII, 19 de outubro de 2016, ICC-01/05-01/13-1989-Red. https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-01/05-01/13-1989-Red.
Public Redacted Judgment on the appeals of Mr Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, Mr Aimé Kilolo Musamba, Mr Jean-Jacques Mangenda Kabongo, Mr Fidèle Babala Wandu and Mr Narcisse Arido against the decision of Trial Chamber VII entitled “Judgment pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute”, Câmara de Apelações, 8 de março de 2018, ICC-01/05-01/13-2275-Red. https://www.icc-cpi.int/Pages/record.aspx?docNo=ICC-01/05-01/13-2275-Red.
Separate Opinion of Judge Geoffrey Henderson” in the “Public Redacted Judgment on the appeals of Mr Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo, Mr Aimé Kilolo Musamba, Mr Jean-Jacques Mangenda Kabongo, Mr Fidèle Babala Wandu and Mr Narcisse Arido against the decision of Trial Chamber VII entitled “Judgment pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute”, 8 de março de 2018, ICC-01/05-01/13-2275-Anx.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/RelatedRecords/CR2018_01633.PDF.
Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dylio
Decision on the final system of disclosure and the establishment of a timetable, Câmara de Julgamento Preliminar I, 15 de maio de 2006, ICC-01/04-01/06-102. https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/CourtRecords/CR2006_02355.PDF.
Judgment on the Appeal of Mr. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo against the Decision on the Defence Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court pursuant to article 19 (2) (a) of the Statute of 3 October 2006, Câmara de Apelações, 14 de dezembro de 2006, ICC-01/04-01/06-772. https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/CourtRecords/CR2007_01307.PDF.
Decision on the Confirmation of Charges, Câmara de Julgamento Preliminar I, 7 de fevereiro de 2007, ICC-01/04-01/06-803-tEN.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/record.aspx?uri=266175.
Judgment on the Appeal of the Prosecutor against the decision of Trial Chamber I entitled "Decision on the consequences of non-disclosure of exculpatory materials covered by Article 54(3)(e) agreements and the application to stay the prosecution of the accused, together with certain other issues raised at the Status, Câmara de Apelações, 21 de outubro de 2008, ICC-01/04-01/06-1486. https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/CourtRecords/CR2008_05884.PDF.
Decision on the admission of material from the ‘bar table', Câmara de Julgamento I, 24 de junho de 2009, ICC-01/04-01/06-1981. https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/record.aspx?uri=702244.
Corrigendum of Decision on the "Prosecution's Second Application for Admission of Documents from the Bar Table Pursuant to Article 64(9)", Câmara de Julgamento I, 25 de outubro de 2010, ICC-01/04-01/06-2589-Corr.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/record.aspx?uri=957876.
Corrigendum to Decision on the admissibility of four documents, Câmara de Julgamento I, 21 de janeiro de 2011, ICC-01/04-01/06-1399-Corr.
https://www.icc-cpi.int/pages/record.aspx?uri=511238.
Tribunal Penal Internacional para a antiga Iugoslávia – (TPII)
Prosecutor v. Radoslav Brdjanin, Decision on the Defence Objection to Intercept Evidence, Câmara de Julgamento II, 3 de outubro de 2003, ICTY IT-99-36-T. https://www.icty.org/x/cases/brdanin/tdec/en/031003.htm.
