Anuario Iberoamericano de Derecho Internacional Penal

ISSN-e: 2346-3120

La doble naturaleza de la recuperación de activos por la Corte Penal Internacional: disuasión de la práctica delictiva y reparación de las víctimas

Flavio Pimenta De Souza - Diogo De Oliveira Machado

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/anidip/a.5671

Texto completo:

PDF (Português (Brasil)) PDF
Enviar este artículo (Es necesario iniciar sesión)
Escanee aquí para descargar

Resumen


La recuperación de los activos relacionados con las prácticas de los crímenes contra
la humanidad, crímenes de guerra y genocidio es una medida contenida en los
instrumentos constitutivos de la Corte Penal Internacional. La tendencia actual de
las resoluciones de la CPI muestran la oportunidade de adoptar la confiscación
de bienes como medida primaria para responder a los conflictos más graves. La
actuación sobre los activos permite detener el flujo de fondos para fines ilícitos,
generando un impacto sobre las estructuras que patrocinan conflictos. Además, iniciativas de desarrollo social, económica y política pueden ser financiadas a través de los bienes recuperados.


Palabras clave


Corte Penal Internacional; recuperación de activos; víctimas; reparación

Referencias


Aas, F.K. (2010). “Global criminology”. En McLaughlin, E. & Newburn, T. (Eds.). The SAGE Handbook of Criminological Theory. London: Sage.

Chung, C. H. (2008). “Victims’ participation at the International Criminal Court: are concessions of the Court clouding the promise?”. Em Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights. Vol. 6, Núm. 3a. edição.

Comissão das Comunidades Europeias. (2008). Proceeds of organized crime: ensuring that crime does not pay. Bruxelas: Comunicação da Comissão ao Parlamento Europeu.

Cunneen, C. (2006). “Exploring the relationship between reparations, the gross violation of human rights and restorative justice”. Em Sullivan, Dennis y Tifft, L. (Eds.). Handbook of restorative justice: a global perspective. London; New York: Routledge, Taylor y Francis Group.

De Jong, C. (2008). “The role of donors”. Em PIETH, M (Ed.). Recovering stolen assets. Bern: Peter Lang.

Federação Internacional de Direitos Humanos (FIDH). (4 de março, 2015). Appeals decision on reparations in Lubanga case opens the way to implementation of first ICC reparation orders. Recuperado de https://www.fidh.org/en/region/Africa/democratic-republic-of-congo/appeals-decision-on-reparations-inlubanga-

case-opens-the-way-to

Ferstman, C. (2002). “The Reparation Regime of the International Criminal Court: Practical Considerations”. Em Leiden Journal of International Law. Vol. 15. Núm. 3.

Ferstman, C. (2003). “The International Criminal Court’s Trust Fund for Victims: challenges and opportunities”. Em Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law. Vol. 6.

Ferstman, C. (2016). “Cooperation and the International Criminal Court: The Freezing, Seizing and Transfer of Assets for the Purpose of Reparations”. Em Bekou, O. & Birkett, D. (Eds.). Cooperation and the International Criminal Court: perspectives from theory and practice. Leiden; Boston: Brill Nijhoff.

Gray, L., Hansen, K., Recica-Kirkbride, P. y Mills, L. (2014). Few and Far: the hard facts on stolen asset recovery. Washington, DC: World Bank and OECD.

International Criminal Court. (2011) Selected basic documents related to the International Criminal Court. The Hague.

International Criminal Court. (junho, 2015). Questions and Answers on the situation of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (ICC-PIDS-QyA-DRC-01-01/15_Eng). Recuperado de https://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/PIDS/publications/Lubanga_QA_03-15_Eng.pdf#search=ICC%2DPIDS%2DQ

International Criminal Court. (junho, 2015). Situations and cases. Recuperado dehttp://www.icccpi.int/en_menus/icc/situations%20and%20cases/Pages/situations%20and%20cases.aspx

International Criminal Court. (novembro, 2016b). Report of the Court on cooperation (ICC-ASP/15/19). Recuperado de https://asp.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/ASP15/ICC-ASP-15-9-ENG.pdf

International Criminal Court. (novembro, 2016c). Report on activities and programme performance of the International Criminal Court for the year 2015(ICC-ASP/15/3). Recuperado de https://asp.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/ASP15/ICC-ASP-15-3-ENG.pdf

International Criminal Court. (2014) Trust Fund for victims strategic plan for the period 2014-2017. The Hague.

Kar, D. & Cartwright-Smith, D. (2009). Illicit financial flows from developing countries, 2002-2006. Washington DC: Global Financial Integrity. Recuperado de http://www.gfintegrity.org/storage/gfip/executive%20%20final%20version%201-5-09.pdf

Laucci, C. (2014). The annotated digest of the International Criminal Court: 2009. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.

Laucci, C. (2016). Code annoté de la Cour Pénale Internationale, 2009. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.

Lima, C. (2009). “Bens de Bemba podem ser congelados”. En BBC para África. Recuperado de http://www.bbc.co.uk/portugueseafrica/news/story/2009/07/090731_cverdebembaassetsvg.shtml

Lugon-Moulin, A. (2008). “Asset recovery: concrete challenges for development assistance”. Em PIETH, M (Ed.). Recovering stolen assets. Bern: Peter Lang.

Mesquita, A. A. (2009). “Jean-Pierre Bemba tinha depósito de 1,7 milhões no BPN”. En Público. Recuperado de https://www.publico.pt/2009/07/30/economia/noticia/jeanpierre-bemba-tinha-deposito-de-17-milhoes-no-bpn-1393903

Mühl, B., Thomas, J. & Gotskova, D. (Eds.) (2012). European Police Office. CARIN MANUAL.

Naylor, R.T. (2004). Wages of crime: black markets, illegal finance and the underworld economy. Ithaca: Cornell University.

Nelen, H. (2004). “Hit them where it hurts most? The proceeds-of-crime approach in the Netherlands”. En Crime, law and social change. Vol. 41. Núm. 5.

REDRESS. (2015). Observations submitted by REDRESS on reparation – 15 May. Recuperado de http://www.redress.org/downloads/2015-submission-on-reparation-in-katanga1505.pdf

REDRESS. (2015). DRC: REDRESS intervenes on the issue of reparations in the Katanga case. Recuperado de http://www.redress.org/admin/viewemail.php?id=586

Schabas, W. (2007). An introduction to the International Criminal Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schabas, W. (2016). The International Criminal Court: A commentary on the Rome Statute. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stephenson, K., Gray, L., Power, R., Brun, J., Dunker, G. y Panjer, M. (2011). Barriers to Asset Recovery: an analysis of the key barriers and recommendations for action. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Stessens, G. (2000). Money laundering: a new international law enforcement model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

UNODC. (2001). Informal expert working group on mutual legal assistance caseworker best practice. Vienna.

UNODC. (2016). Convenção das Nações Unidas contra a Corrupção. Recuperado de https://www.unodc.org/documents/lpo-brazil//Topics_corruption/Publicacoes/2007_UNCAC_Port.pdf.

UNODC. (2016). Convenção das Nações Unidas contra o Crime Organizado Transnacional. Recuperado de http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2004/decreto/d5015.htm.

Umbreit, Mark S., Coates, R. y Bradshaw, W. (1999). “Victims of severe violence meet the offender: restorative justice through dialogue”. Em International review of victimology. Vol. 6. Núm. 4.

Jurisprudencia

CPI [SCP III]. The Prosecutor v Jean Pierre Bemba Gombo. Decisão e Pedido com Vista a Obter a Identificação, a Localização, o Congelamento e a Apreensão de Bens e Haveres, Apresentados à República Portuguesa. ICC-01/05-01-08.

de maio de 2008. Recuperado de https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2008_03085.PDF

CPI [SCP III]. The Prosecutor v Jean Pierre Bemba Gombo. Decision on the Second Defence’s Application for Lifting the Seizure of Assets and Request for Cooperation to the Competent Authorities of the Republic of Portugal. ICC-01/05-01/08-249. 24 de noviembre de 2008. Recuperado de https://

www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2008_06574.PDF

CPI [SPI III]. The Prosecutor v Jean Pierre Bemba Gombo. Redacted version of “Decision on the defence application to lift Order iii) of the “Decision on legal assistance for the accused”dated 20 October 2009”. ICC-01/05-01/08-

-Red. 19 de noviembre de 2009. Recuperado de https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2009_08427.PDF

CPI [SPI III]. The Prosecutor v Jean Pierre Bemba Gombo. Redacted version of “Decision on legal assistance for the accused”. ICC-01/05-01/08-567-Red. 26 de

Noviembre de 2009. Recuperado de https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2009_08694.PDF

CPI [Fondo Fiduciario]. The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. Filing on Reparations and Draft Implementation Plan. ICC-01/04-01/06-3177-Red. 03 de noviembre de 2015. Recuperado de https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2015_20832.PDF

CPI [SPI II]. The Prosecutor v Thomas Lubanga Dyilo. Order instructing the Trust Fund for Victims to supplement the draft implementation plan. ICC-01/04-01/06-3198-tENG. ICC-01/04-01/06-3198-tENG. 09 de febrero de 2016.

Recuperado de https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2016_01895.PDF

CPI [SPI VII]. The Prosecutor v Jean Pierre Bemba Gombo, Aimé Kilolo Musamba, Jean-Jacques Mangenda Kabongo, Fidèle Babala Wando and Narcisse Arido. Public, with Confidential Ex Parte (Bemba Defence only) Annexes 1, and 2, and Public Annex 3 – Urgent Defence Request for an Order to Grant the Defence Provisional Legal Assistance. ICC-01/05-01/13-1967. 12

de agosto de 2016. Recuperado de https://www.icc-cpi.int/CourtRecords/CR2016_05593.PDF


El archivo PDF seleccionado se debe cargar aquí si su navegador tiene instalado un módulo de lectura de PDF (por ejemplo, una versión reciente de Adobe Acrobat Reader).

Si desea más información sobre cómo imprimir, guardar y trabajar con PDFs, Highwire Press le proporciona una guía útil de Preguntas frecuentes sobre PDFs.

Por otro lado, puede descargar el PDF directamente a su ordenador donde podrá abrirlo con un lector de PDF. Para descargar el PDF, haga clic en el enlace anterior.


Métricas