El rol de las redes nacionales de investigación y educación en las Ciencias Sociales
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
En este artículo se revisa el impacto de la transformación digital en las investigación en ciencias sociales. La posibilidad de usar grandes volúmenes de datos está limitada por la disponibilidad de infraestructura. En este contexto el rol de las redes nacionales de investigación y educación es fundamental. A tal fin se debe contar con un conjunto de servicios básicos expuestos a lo largo del texto y, finalmente, se proponen algunas acciones concretas para fortalecer la capacidad de los investigadores de usar esta tecnología para potenciar la capacidad de producir conocimiento y enfrentar los acuciantes problemas que enfrenta la humanidad.
Descargas
Abbott, B. P., et al. (2017). GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star
Inspiral. Physical Review Letters, 119(16), 161101–1-161101–18. Doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101
Andrejevic, M. (2014). Big Data, Big Questions| The Big Data Divide. International Journal of Communication,
(17). Recuperado de https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2161
Baumberg, J. J. (2018). The secret life of science: how it really works and why it matters. Princeton: Princeton
University Press.
Boyd, D. & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical Questions for Big Data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679. Doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
Cadenas, L. E. & Hernández, E. (2006). Knowledge Perspectives in Data Grids. En Bramer, M. (Ed.), Artificial Intelligence in Theory and Practice (pp. 189-198). Nueva York: International Federation for Information
Processing (ifip).
Carvalho, J., Laranjeira, C., Vaz, V. & Moreira, J. M. (2017). Monitoring a National Open Access Funder
Mandate. Procedia Computer Science, 106, 283-290. Doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.03.027
Coccia, M. & Wang, L. (2016). Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(18), 2057-2061. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510820113
Colson, D., Petropoulos, G. P. & Ferentinos, K. P. (2018). Exploring the Potential of Sentinels-1 & 2 of the
Copernicus Mission in Support of Rapid and Cost-effective Wildfire Assessment. International Journal of
Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 73, 262-276. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2018.06.011
Conte, R., et al. (2012). Manifesto of computational social science. The European Physical Journal Special
Topics, 214(1), 325-346. Doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01697-8
Education Roaming (EduRoaM) (2019). About. Recuperado de https://www.eduroam.org/about/
Epstein, J. M. (1999). Agent‐based computational models and generative social science. Complexity, 4,
-60. Doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0526(199905/06)4:5<41::AID-CPLX9>3.0.CO;2-F
Eysenbach, G. (2006). The open access advantage. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(2), e8. Doi:
2196/jmir.8.2.e8
Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U. & Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of
social norms. Human Nature, 13(1), 1-25. Doi: 10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7
Fortunato, S., et al. (2018). Science of science. American Association for the Advancement of Science,
(6379), eaao0185. Doi: 10.1126/science.aao0185
Gold, M. K. (Ed.) (2012). Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Group on Earth Observations (GEo) (2019). Geo at a Glance. Recuperado de http://www.earthobservations.
org/geo_wwd.php
Harari, Y. N. (2015). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. Nueva York: HarperCollins.
Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 62(3859), 1243-1248. Doi: 10.1126/
science.162.3859.1243
Harnad, S., et al. (2008). The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access: An
Update. Serials Review, 34(1), 36-40. Doi: 10.1016/j.serrev.2007.12.005
Hey, T. & Trefethen, A. E. (2005). Cyberinfrastructure for e-science. Science, 308(5723), 817-821. Doi:
1126/science.1110410
Jutz, S. & Milagro-Pérez, M. P. (2018). 1.06 - Copernicus Program. En Liang, S. (Ed.), Comprehensive Remote
Sensing (pp. 150-191). Oxford: Elsevier.
Kennedy, H. & Moss, G. (2015). Known or knowing publics? Social media data mining and the question of
public agency. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1-11. Doi: 10.1177/2053951715611145
Kitchin, R. (2014). Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1-12. Doi:
1177/2053951714528481
Kosinski, M., Matz, S. C., Gosling, S. D., Popov, V., & Stillwell, D. (2015). Facebook as a research tool for the
social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines. American
Psychologist, 70(6), 543-556. Doi: 10.1037/a0039210
Koutras, N. & Bottis, M. (2013). Institutional Repositories of Open Access: A Paradigm of Innovation and
Changing in Educational Politics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 1499-1504. Doi: 10.1016/j.
sbspro.2013.12.169
Lautenbaucher, C. C. (2006). The Global Earth Observation System of Systems: Science Serving Society.
Space Policy, 22(1), 8-11. Doi: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2005.12.004
Lazer, D., et al. (2009). Computational Social Science. Science, 323(5915), 721-723. Doi: 10.1126/science.1167742
Lindebaum, D. (2015). Book Review of Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. Management Learning, 46(5),
-638. Doi: 10.1177/1350507615602981
Manovich, L. (2012). Trending: The Promises and the Challenges of Big Social Data. En Gold M. K. (Ed.),
Debates in the Digital Humanities (pp. 460-475). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
McClure, C. R., Bishop, A. P., Doty, P. & Rosenbaum, H. (1991). The National Research and Education
Network (nREn): Research and policy perspectives. Washington: Eric Digest. Recuperado de https://eric.
ed.gov/?q=The+National+Research+and+Education+Network+(NREN)%3a+Research+and+Policy+Perspectives&ft=on&ff1=autBishop%2c+Ann+P.&id=ED340390
Merle, J. & Meek, V. L. (2013). Scientific mobility and international research networks: trends and policy
tools for promoting research excellence and capacity building. Studies in Higher Education, 38(3), 331-344.
Doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.773789
Metcalf, J. & Crawford, K. (2016). Where are human subjects in Big Data research? The emerging ethics
divide. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 1-14. Doi: 10.1177/2053951716650211
Nativi, S., Mazzetti, P., Santoro, M., Papeschi, F., Craglia, M., & Ochiai, O. (2015). Big Data challenges in
building the Global Earth Observation System of Systems. Environmental Modelling & Software, 68, 1-26.
Doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.01.017
Popper, K. P. (1967). La lógica de la investigación científica. Madrid: Tecnos.
Roehrig, A. D., Soper, D., Cox, B. E., & Colvin, G. P. (2018). Changing the Default to Support Open Access to
Education Research. Educational Researcher, 47(7), 465-473. Doi: 10.3102/0013189X18782974
Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N., & Watkinson, A. (2011). Social media use in the research
workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3), 183-195. Doi: 10.1087/20110306
Salles, A., et al. (2019). The Human Brain Project: Responsible Brain Research for the Benefit of Society.
Neuron, 101(3), 380-384. Doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.005
Sanchez, J. (2012). Predatory publishers are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 179. Doi:
1038/489179a
Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics:
A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, 2037-2062.
Doi: 10.1002/asi.23833
unEsco (2015). unEsco Science Report: Towards 2030. París: unEsco. Recuperado de https://unesdoc.unesco.
org/ark:/48223/pf0000235406
Van Noorden, R. (2013). Open access: The true cost of science publishing. Nature, 495, 426-429. Doi:
1038/495426a
Wilsdon, J., et al. (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations: global scientific collaboration in the 21st century.
Londres: The Royal Society.
Wulder, M., et al. (2019). Current status of Landsat program, science, and applications. Remote Sensing of
Environment, 225, 127-147. Doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.015
Zhu, Z., et al. (2019). Benefits of the free and open Landsat data policy. Remote Sensing of Environment,
, 382-385. Doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2019.02.016
Detalles del artículo

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.