Main Article Content

Authors

-----

The armed conflict in Colombia is full of lessons for negotiated conflict resolution. Insofar as this has been a complex and long-lasting confrontation, the armed groups have now become protagonists. Their objectives as much as their use of violence has generated controversy about which actions or responses should be implemented to face such situations. Similarly to other countries, the players concerned have participated in several rapprochements, political dialogues or peace processes by contributing experience in negotiations that involve different sectors of the civil society, state players, the international community, and multilateral organizations. To that effect, it is relevant not only to retake the emergence, characterization and possible motivations of three of the biggest groups outside the law –paramilitary, ELN, FARC– which have participated in the conflict, but also to explore the rapprochement methods the Colombian government and its different administrations have employed with these groups. This way, we can fully understand the complexity and the multiple dimensions in the representation of various views of the conflict evolution and the short, medium, and long-term events in as much as this allows clarification of the continuity and discontinuity that have resulted in seeing the phenomenon from the standpoint of cultural causes, political complexities or economic perspectives.

 

Diane Tawse-Smith

Politóloga, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (Bogotá, Colombia).

Tawse-Smith, D. (2010). The Armed Conflict in Colombia. Desafíos, 19, 269–299. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/desafios/a.413

ACCORD. “Conciliation Resources”, Revista Internacional de Iniciativas de Paz, Indepaz, 2004.

Archila Neira, Mauricio. “Colombia en el cambio de siglo: actores sociales, guerra y política, Nueva Sociedad 2002, 182, 77-89. Recuperado de http://www.nuso.org/upload/articulos/3089_1.pdf

Arnson, Cynthia, (ed.). “The Peace Process in Colombia with the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia-AUC”, Woodrow Wilson Center Report on the Americas 2005, 13.

Bejarano, Ana María. “Conflicto y paz en Colombia: cuatro tesis con implicaciones para la negociación en curso”. Ponencia preparada para la conferencia “Colombia in Context”, organizada por el Center for Latin American Studies y el Colombia Working Group, en la Universidad de California, Berkeley, marzo 2 de 2001.

Bejarano, Jesús Antonio. “Ensanchando el centro: el papel de la sociedad civil en el proceso de paz”, en Domínguez, Eduardo y Monsalve, Alfonso (eds.), Colombia: democracia y paz. Medellín: Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, 1999.

Boudon, Lawrence. “Guerrillas and the State: The Role of the State in the Colombian Peace Process”, Journal of Latin American Studies 1996, 28, 2: 279-297.

Cubides, Fernando. “Flujos y reflujos del paramilitarismo”, en Restrepo Moreno, Luis Alberto, (ed.), Síntesis 2000: Anuario Social, Político y Económico de Colombia. Bogotá: Tercer Mundo, 2000.

---. “Los paramilitares y su estrategia”, en Deas, Malcolm y Llorente, María Victoria (eds.), Reconocer la guerra para construir la paz. Bogotá: Cerec, 1999, pp. 151-199.

Deas, Malcolm. “Interpretation of the Recent Colombian Violence”, in Apter, David (ed.), The Legitimization of Violence. New York University Press, Washington Square, N.Y., 1997.

---. “Algunos interrogantes sobre la relación guerras civiles y violencia”, en Penaranda, R. y Sánchez, G. (eds.), Pasado y presente de la violencia en Colombia. Bogotá: Cerec, 1997.

---. “Canjes violentos: reflexiones sobre la violencia política en Colombia”, en Deas, Malcom y Gaitán, Fernando. Dos ensayos especulativos sobre la violencia en Colombia. Bogotá: Fonade, 1995.

Echandía Castilla, Camilo y Alejandro Reyes. “El conflicto armado en Colombia: de las condiciones objetivas al accionar estratégico de los actores, OASIS 99. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia, 2000, pp. 350-364.

Echandía, Castilla, Camilo. “Expansión territorial de las guerrillas colombianas: geografía, economía y violencia”, en Deas, Malcom y Llorente, María Victoria (comps.), Reconocer la guerra para construir la paz. Bogotá: Cerec/Norma/Ediciones Uniandes, 1999.

Keen, David. “Incentives and Disincentives for Violence”, en Caplan, R. y Feiffer, J., Europe’s New Nationalism, Oxford University Press, 2000.

O’Donnell, Guillermo. Democracy, Law and Comparative Politics. The Kellogg Institute forInternational Studies, University of Notre Dame, Working Paper # 274, abril de 2000.

Palacios, Marco. “La solución política al conflicto armado, 1982-1997”, en Camacho Guizado, Álvaro y Leal Buitrago, Francisco (comps.), Armar la paz es desarmar la guerra, Bogotá: FESCOL – IEPRI – CEREC, 1999.

Pizarro Leongómez, Eduardo. Insurgencia sin revolución. La guerrilla en Colombia en una perspectiva comparada. Bogotá: Tercer Mundo, 1996.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.