El Ecocidio: Entre la Crisis Climática y la Crisis de la Corte Penal Internacional

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/anidip/a.14558

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF

Publicado: Dec 17, 2024
Número: Núm. 12 (2024): ANIDIP 12
Sección Ensayos seleccionados del XIV Certamen Blattmann, Odio Benito y Steiner


Palabras clave: ecocidio; efecto disuasorio y expresivo; enfoque antropocéntrico; responsabilidad penal internacional; aplicación selectiva de la CPI

Contenido principal del artículo

Autores/as

  Jonas Rosengardt
Universität Münster

Resumen

El cambio climático es uno de los temas dominantes de nuestro tiempo, pero los esfuerzos nacionales e internacionales no corresponden a sus expectativas. Por ello, se depositan grandes esperanzas en la criminalización del ecocidio.


Este ensayo analiza si puede cumplir estas expectativas. Para ello, discute la compatibilidad del Derecho Internacional Penal y Ambiental y las posibilidades del Derecho Penal para proteger el clima mediante la disuasión y la expresividad. Se plantea, entonces, la cuestión de si debe adoptarse un enfoque antropocéntrico o ecocéntrico para el ecocidio. En particular, se contempla la compatibilidad de la protección del medio ambiente con los intereses humanos legítimos y nuestra limitación a las perspectivas humanas. Por último, se cuestiona que la Corte Penal Internacional sea el foro adecuado para la criminalización del ecocidio. Aquí, se debate la responsabilidad penal individual y la aplicación selectiva de la Corte Penal Internacional.

Cómo citar
Rosengardt, J. (2024). El Ecocidio: Entre la Crisis Climática y la Crisis de la Corte Penal Internacional. Anuario Iberoamericano De Derecho Internacional Penal, (12). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/anidip/a.14558
Referencias bibliográfica

Doctrina:

Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280

Aditi, J., & Charu, S. (2021). Ecocide: A New International Crime. Jus Corpus Law Journal, 2(2), 627–634.

Ahmed, A., & Mustofa, J. (2016). ROLE OF SOFT LAW IN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION: AN OVERVIEW, Global Journal of Politics and Law Research, 4(2), 1-18.

Aksenova, M. (2017). Symbolism as a Constraint on International Criminal Law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 30(2), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156516000741

Ambos, K. (2002). Superior Responsibility. En THE ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT: A COMMENTARY (Vol. 3, pp. 823–872). Oxford: Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta, John R. W. D. Jones.

Anderson, H. S. (2020, septiembre 2). Why Them? On the U.S. Sanctions Against Int’l Criminal Court Officials. Recuperado 23 de mayo de 2024, de Just Security website: https://www.justsecurity.org/72275/why-them-on-the-u-s-sanctions-against-intl-criminal-court-officials/

Aparac, J. (2020, abril 6). ICL and Environmental Protection Symposium: International Criminal Courts as Potential Jurisdiction for Corporate Responsibility for Environmental Crimes (Part II). Recuperado de OpinioJuris website: http://opiniojuris.org/2020/06/04/icl-and-environmental-protection-symposium-international-criminal-courts-as-potential-jurisdiction-for-corporate-responsibility-for-environmental-crimes-part-ii/

Atapattu, S. (2012). International environmental law and soft law: a new direction or a contradiction? En C. M. Bailliet (Ed.), Non-State Actors, Soft Law and Protective Regimes: From the Margins (pp. 200–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139134989.013

Baker, S. (2015). Sustainable Development (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203121177

Bassiouni, M. C., & Manikas, P. (1996). The law of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y.: Transnational Publishers.

Baste, I. A., & Watson, R. T. (Eds.). (2021). Making peace with nature: a scientific blueprint to tackle the climate, biodiversity and pollution emergencies. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.

Bentham, J. (1970). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation (J. H. Burns & H. L. A. Hart, Eds.). London: Athlone P.

Bikundo, E. (2012). The International Criminal Court and Africa: Exemplary Justice. Law and Critique, 23(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-011-9094-1

Boivin, N. L., Zeder, M. A., Fuller, D. Q., Crowther, A., Larson, G., Erlandson, J. M., … Petraglia, M. D. (2016). Ecological consequences of human niche construction: Examining long-term anthropogenic shaping of global species distributions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(23), 6388–6396. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525200113

Boyd, W. (2019). The Clean Air Act’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards: A Case Study of Durability and Flexibility in Program Design and Implementation. En A. Carlson & D. Burtraw (Eds.), Lessons from the Clean Air Act (1a ed., pp. 15–56). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108377195.002

Branch, A., & Minkova, L. (2023). Ecocide, the Anthropocene, and the International Criminal Court. Ethics & International Affairs, 37(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679423000059

Brickey, K. F. (1996). Environmental crime at the crossroads: the intersection of environmental and criminal law theory. Tulane law review, 71(2), 487–507.

Camproux Duffrène, M.-P., & Jaworski, V. (2021). LEGAL PARADIGM SHIFTS FOR A NEW ENVIRONMENTAL LAW. Greens/European Free Alliance.

Cárdenas Rodríguez, L. C., Pontón Serra, J. P., Prieto-Ríos, E., & Suárez Vargas, D. (2021). LA PERSPECTIVA DEL POSCOLONIALISMO Y EL SUR GLOBAL. En LA FUNCIÓN DE LA CORTE PENAL INTERNACIONAL: VISIONES PLURALES DESDE UNA PERSPECTIVA INTERDISCIPLINAR: Vol. Volumen Especial por el X Aniversario del Instituto Ibero-Americano de la Haya para la Paz, los Derechos Humanos y la Justicia Internacional. Valencia.

Carpenter, C. (2021, julio 13). How the Inclusion of Ecocide among the Rome Statute’s Crimes Could Counter Neo-Colonial Criticisms. Recuperado de Jus Cogens: The International Law Podcast & Blog website: https://juscogens.law.blog/2021/07/13/how-the-inclusion-of-ecocide-among-the-rome-statutes-crimes-could-counter-neo-colonial-criticisms/

Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: science and practice. Pymble, NSW: HarperCollins ebooks.

Cooter, R. (1998). Expressive Law And Economics. The Journal of Legal Studies, 27(S2), 585–607. https://doi.org/10.1086/468036

Cooter, R. (2000). Three effects of social norms on law: expression, deterrence,and internalization. Oregon law review, 79(1), 1–22.

Cronin-Furman, K. (2013). Managing Expectations: International Criminal Trials and the Prospects for Deterrence of Mass Atrocity. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 7(3), 434–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijt016

Cushing, L., Morello-Frosch, R., Wander, M., & Pastor, M. (2015). The Haves, the Have-Nots, and the Health of Everyone: The Relationship Between Social Inequality and Environmental Quality. Annual Review of Public Health, 36(1), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122646

de Paor, R. (2020). Hacia la criminalidad climática: creación de una quinta categoría de crimen bajo el Estatuto de Roma para penalizar la agravación del cambio climático. Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional, 36, 289–325. https://doi.org/10.15581/010.36.289-325

Dehan, A. E. (1992). An International Environmental Court: Should There Be One. Touro Journal of Transnational Law, 3, 31–58.

Di Paola, M. (2024). Virtue, Environmental Ethics, Nonhuman Values, and Anthropocentrism. Philosophies, 9(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9010015

Dosio, A., Mentaschi, L., Fischer, E. M., & Wyser, K. (2018). Extreme heat waves under 1.5 °C and 2 °C global warming. Environmental Research Letters, 13(5), 054006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab827

Drumbl, M. A. (2009). Accountability for Property Crimes and Environmental War Crimes: Prosecution, Litigation, and Development. International Center for transitional justice. Recuperado de https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Development-PropertyCrimes-FullPaper-2009-English.pdf

Dupuy, P.-M. (1991). Soft law and the international law of the environment. Michigan journal of international law, 12(2), 420–435.

Elies, V. S. (2012). Individual Criminal Responsibility in International Law (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199560363.001.0001

Falk, R. A. (2014). A Global Approach to National Policy (Reprint 2014). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Faure, M. (2006). Towards a new model of criminalization of environmental pollution: the case of Indonesia. En M. Faure & N. Niessen (Eds.), Environmental Law in Development. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847202918.00013

Figlio, R. M. (1975). The Seriousness of Offenses: An Evaluation by Offenders and Nonoffenders. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 66(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.2307/1142782

Fletcher, L. E., & Weinstein, H. M. (2002). Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contribution of Justice to Reconciliation. Human Rights Quarterly, 24(3), 573–639. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2002.0033

Fletcher, R., & Büscher, B. (2016). Why E O Wilson is wrong about how to save the Earth. Recuperado de aeon website: https://aeon.co/opinions/why-e-o-wilson-is-wrong-about-how-to-save-the-earth

Florio, M. E. (2023). Struggle in Favour of a Criminal Law as an ‘ultima ratio’. Critical Observations on the Criminalisation Obligations Arising from the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the Light of the Principle of Subsidiarity. European Criminal Law Review, 13(2), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2023-2-135

Frumhoff, P. C., Heede, R., & Oreskes, N. (2015). The climate responsibilities of industrial carbon producers. Climatic Change, 132(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1472-5

Funk, P. (2005). Governmental Action, Social Norms, and Criminal Behavior. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 161(3), 522. https://doi.org/10.1628/093245605774259363

Gagnon Thompson, S. C., & Barton, M. A. (1994). Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80168-9

Gardiner, S. M., & Thompson, A. (Eds.). (2015). The Oxford handbook of environmental ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Gärditz, K. F. (2016). Demokratizität des Strafrechts und Ultima Ratio-Grundsatz. JuristenZeitung, 71(13), 641. https://doi.org/10.1628/002268816X14630596442166

Gillett, M. (2022). Prosecuting Environmental Harm before the International Criminal Court (1a ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009070027

Glasgow, J. (2015). The Expressivist Theory of Punishment Defended. Law and Philosophy, 34(6), 601–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-015-9235-z

Granik, M. (2015). Indirect Perpetration Theory: A Defence. Leiden Journal of International Law, 28(4), 977–992. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156515000540

Guzman, A., & Meyer, T. (2010). International Soft Law. Journal of Legal Analysis, 2(1), 171–225. Recuperado de https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/4207

Haffke, B. (2001). Die Legitimation des staatlichen Strafrechts zwischen Effizienz, Freiheitsverbürgung und Symbolik. En B. Schünemann, H. Achenbach, W. Bottke, B. Haffke, & H.-J. Rudolphi (Eds.), Festschrift für Claus Roxin zum 70. Geburtstag am 15. Mai 2001 (pp. 955–976). DE GRUYTER. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110877021.955

Haslam, N., & Loughnan, S. (2014). Dehumanization and Infrahumanization. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 399–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115045

Haslem, B., Hutton, I., & Smith, A. H. (2017). How Much Do Corporate Defendants Really Lose? A New Verdict on the Reputation Loss Induced by Corporate Litigation. Financial Management, 46(2), 323–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12171

Hayward, T. (1997). Anthropocentrism: A Misunderstood Problem. Environmental Values, 6(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327197776679185

Heede, R. (2014). Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010. Climatic Change, 122(1–2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0986-y

Hey, E. (2000). Reflections on an International Environmental Court. Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff.

Hodgson, N. (2021). Exploring the International Criminal Court’s deterrent potential: A case study of Australian politics. Journal of international criminal justice, 19(4), 913–938.

Holland, T. G., Peterson, G. D., & Gonzalez, A. (2009). A Cross‐National Analysis of How Economic Inequality Predicts Biodiversity Loss. Conservation Biology, 23(5), 1304–1313. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01207.x

Hudson, W. D. (Ed.). (1969). The Is-Ought Question. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15336-7

HumanRightsWatch. (2005). Uprooted and Forgotten Impunity and Human Rights Abuses in Northern Uganda. HumanRightsWatch. Recuperado de HumanRightsWatch website: https://www.hrw.org/report/2005/09/20/uprooted-and-forgotten/impunity-and-human-rights-abuses-northern-uganda

Keenan, P. J. (2019). International Criminal Law and Climate Change. Boston University International Law Journal, 37(1), 89–122.

Kersting, N. (2021). On Symbolism and Beyond. Völkerrechtsblog. https://doi.org/10.17176/20210708-135823-0

Khakzad, D. (2015). Kriminologische Aspekte völkerrechtlicher Verbrechen: eine vergleichende Untersuchung der Situationsländer des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofs. Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg.

Khanna, V. S. (1996). Corporate Criminal Liability: What Purpose Does It Serve? Harvard Law Review, 109(7), 1477. https://doi.org/10.2307/1342023

Kirkham, N. (2024). A Virtue Ethics Interpretation of the ‘Argument from Nature’ for Both Humans and the Environment. Philosophies, 9(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9010019

Kopnina, H. (2013). Evaluating education for sustainable development (ESD): using Ecocentric and Anthropocentric Attitudes toward the Sustainable Development (EAATSD) scale. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 15(3), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-012-9395-z

Kopnina, H. (2016). Of big hegemonies and little tigers: Ecocentrism and environmental justice. The Journal of Environmental Education, 47(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1048502

Kopnina, H., Washington, H., Taylor, B., & J Piccolo, J. (2018). Anthropocentrism: More than Just a Misunderstood Problem. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9711-1

Latour, B. (2004). Politics of Nature. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674039964

Lazarus, R. (1995). Meeting the demands of integration in the evolution of environmental law: reforming environmental criminal law. The Georgetown law journal, 83(7), 2407–2546.

Leopold, A. (1987). A Sand County almanac, and sketches here and there. New York: Oxford University Press.

Levi, M., & Jones, S. (1985). PUBLIC AND POLICE PERCEPTIONS OF CRIME SERIOUSNESS IN ENGLAND AND WALES. The British Journal of Criminology, 25(3), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047529

Lien, M. E., & Law, J. (2011). ‘Emergent Aliens’: On Salmon, Nature, and Their Enactment. Ethnos, 76(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2010.549946

Lindén, O., Jernelöv, A., & Egerup, J. (2004). The Environmental Impacts of the Gulf War 1991 (Interim Report No IR-04-019). Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

Lindgren, T. (2018). Ecocide, genocide and the disregard of alternative life-systems. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(4), 525–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2017.1397631

Lippman, M. (2012). The genocide convention: the legacy of 60 years (H. van der Wilt, Ed.). Leiden ; Boston: M. Nijhoff Pub.

McAdams, R. H. (2000). An attitudinal theory of expressive law. Oregon law review, 79(2), 339–390.

McLaughlin, R. (2000). Improving compliance: making non-state international actors responsible for environmental crimes. Colorado journal of international environmental law and policy, 11(2), 377–409.

Medlock, F., & White, R. (2022). Ecocide, Ecocentrism and Social Obligation. Erasmus Law Review, 15(3), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000220

Mégret, Frederic. (2001). Three Dangers for the International Criminal Court: A Critical Look at a Consensual Project. Finnish Yearbook of International Law, 12, 193–247. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1156086

Mégret, Frederic. (2011). The problem of an international criminal law of the environment. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 36(2), 195–257.

Mégret, Frédéric. (2013). The Case for a General International Crime against the Environment. En S. Jodoin & M.-C. Cordonier Segger (Eds.), Sustainable Development, International Criminal Justice, and Treaty Implementation (1a ed., pp. 50–70). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507561.006

Mennecke, M. (2007). Punishing Genocidaires: A Deterrent Effect or Not? Human Rights Review, 8(4), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-007-0017-3

Minteer, B. A. (2009). Anthropocentrism. En J. B. Callicott & R. Frodeman (Eds.), Encyclopedia of environmental ethics and philosophy (pp. 58–62). Gale Ceb.

Mührel, L. (2022). Ökozid als fünftes Kernverbrechen im Rom-Statut – Meilenstein oder Gefahr für das Völkerstrafrecht? (3), 322–352. https://doi.org/10.1628/avr-2022–0018

Nakashidze, G. (2022, marzo 25). Uniting for Justice: Group Referrals to the International Criminal Court. Recuperado de OpinioJuris website: http://opiniojuris.org/2022/03/25/uniting-for-justice-group-referrals-to-the-international-criminal-court/

Neira, H., Russo, L. I., & Álvarez Subiabre, B. (2019). Ecocidio. Revista de Filosofía, 76, 127–148. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-43602019000200127

Nesiah, V. (2016). Doing History with Impunity. En K. Engle, Z. Miller, & D. M. Davis (Eds.), Anti-Impunity and the Human Rights Agenda (1a ed., pp. 95–122). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139942263.004

Neubacher, F. (2005). Kriminologische Grundlagen einer internationalen Strafgerichtsbarkeit: politische Ideen- und Dogmengeschichte, kriminalwissenschaftliche Legitimation, strafrechtliche Perspektiven. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

Nyawo, J. (2017). Selective Enforcement and International Criminal Law: The International Criminal Court and Africa (1a ed.). Intersentia. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780685014

Ocampo, L. M. (2022). The ICC Investigation in Afghanistan. En L. M. Ocampo (Ed.), War and Justice in the 21st Century: A Case Study on the International Criminal Court and its Interaction with the War on Terror (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628973.003.0019

Olasolo, H. (2012). Essays on International Criminal Justice (1a ed.). Hart Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472565792

Palarczyk, D. (2023). Ecocide Before the International Criminal Court: Simplicity is Better Than an Elaborate Embellishment. Criminal Law Forum, 34(2), 147–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-023-09453-z

Parker, B. S. (2012). Applying the Doctrine of Superior Responsibility to Corporate Officers: A Theory of Individual Liability for International Human Rights Violations. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 35(1), 1–27.

Paternoster, R. (2010). How much do we really know about criminal deterrence? The journal of criminal law & criminology, 100(3), 765–824.

Pedersen, O. W. (2012). An International Environmental Court and International Legalism. Journal of Environmental Law, 24(3), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqs022

Pereira, R. (2020). After the ICC Office of the Prosecutor’s 2016 Policy Paper on Case Selection and Prioritisation: Towards an International Crime of Ecocide? Criminal Law Forum, 31(2), 179–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-020-09393-y

Pezzot, R., & Graf, J.-P. (2022). Ecocide: Legal Revolution or Symbolism? Völkerrechtsblog. https://doi.org/10.17176/20220203-120935-0

Piernas López, J. J. (2015). Estudio sobre la práctica de la Corte Penal Internacional en materia de Investigaciones preliminares a la luz de la reciente remisión de la Unión de Comores. Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional, 29, 327–361. https://doi.org/10.15581/010.29.2514

Pinto Andrade, J. (2023). Efecto desuasorio del enjuiciamiento rápido: un estudio en el país vasco. Misión Jurídica, 43–70. https://doi.org/10.25058/1794600X.2206

Plomp, C. (2014). Aiding and Abetting: The Responsibility of Business Leaders under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 30(79), 4–29. https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.cl

Posner, E. A. (2007). Climate Change and International Human Rights Litigation: A Critical Appraisal. University of Pennsylvania law review, (6), 1925–1945.

Preston, J. L., & Shin, F. (2021). Anthropocentric biases in teleological thinking: How nature seems designed for humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(5), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000981

Rasmussen, D. J., Bittermann, K., Buchanan, M. K., Kulp, S., Strauss, B. H., Kopp, R. E., & Oppenheimer, M. (2018). Extreme sea level implications of 1.5 °C, 2.0 °C, and 2.5 °C temperature stabilization targets in the 21st and 22nd centuries. Environmental Research Letters, 13(3), 034040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaac87

Rauter, T. (2017). Nullum Crimen Sine Lege. En T. Rauter, Judicial Practice, Customary International Criminal Law and Nullum Crimen Sine Lege (pp. 19–86). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64477-6_3

Rawal, S. (2022). Law and economics behind ecocide: Juggling between rules and standards. Environmental Law Review, 24(4), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614529221107740

Rendón Osorio, K. V. (2023). La naturaleza en el ordenamiento jurídico colombiano: ¿del antropocentrismo al ecocentrismo? Revista Derecho del Estado, (58), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.18601/01229893.n58.12

Robinson, D. (2022). Ecocide — Puzzles and Possibilities. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 20(2), 313–347. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqac021

Rogers, N., & Maloney, M. (2014). The Australian Wild Law Judgment Project. Alternative Law Journal, 39(3), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X1403900307

Rona, G. (2019, abril 15). More on What’s Wrong with the ICC’s Decision on Afghanistan. Recuperado 24 de mayo de 2024, de Opinio Juris website: http://opiniojuris.org/2019/04/15/more-on-whats-wrong-with-the-iccs-decision-on-afghanistan/

Ross, H. L. (1984). Deterring the drinking driver: legal policy and social control. Lexington Books.

Roy, S. (2021). Theory of Social Proof and Legal Compliance: A Socio-Cognitive Explanation for Regulatory (Non) Compliance. German Law Journal, 22(2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.5

Sands, P. (2000). Environmental protection in the twenty-first century: sustainable development and international law. En R. L. Revesz, P. Sands, & R. B. Stewart (Eds.), Environmental Law, the Economy and Sustainable Development (1a ed., pp. 369–409). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511720871.013

Sands, P., Peel, J., Aguilar, A. F., & MacKenzie, R. (2012). Principles of International Environmental Law (3a ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139019842

Scarpello, A., Iranzo Dosdad, A., Márquez Carrasco, C., Gelmi, M. E., & Cortés Martínez, P. D. (2021). Ecocidio y responsabilidad corporativa. Revista Electrónica de Derecho Internacional Contemporáneo, 4(4), 021. https://doi.org/10.24215/2618303Xe021

Schabas, W. (2008). Brave new world: the role of the prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. Friedens-Warte: Blaetter fuer internationale Verstaendigung und zwischenstaatliche Organisation, 83(4), 11–31.

Schabas, W. (2012). Unimaginable: Atrocities Justice, Politics, and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199653072.001.0001

Schabas, W. A. (2017). An Introduction to the International Criminal Court (5a ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459997

Schirmer, J.-E. (2023). Nachhaltiges Privatrecht. Mohr Siebeck.

Schnädelbach, H. (2012). Was Philosophen wissen: und was man von ihnen lernen kann. Verlag C.H.BECK oHG. https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406633614

Segger, M.-C. C. (2013). International Law, Criminal Justice, and Sustainable Development. En S. Jodoin & M.-C. Cordonier Segger (Eds.), Sustainable Development, International Criminal Justice, and Treaty Implementation (1a ed., pp. 17–35). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139507561.004

Serra Palao, P. (2020). Cómo hacer frente a la impunidad ambiental: hacia una Convención Internacional contra el ecocidio. Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.56398/ajacieda.00143

Singhania, V. (2022, febrero 16). The Proposed Crime of Ecocide – Ignoring the Question of Liability. Recuperado de OpinioJuris website: http://opiniojuris.org/2022/02/16/the-proposed-crime-of-ecocide-ignoring-the-question-of-liability/

Sliedregt, E. van. (2012). Individual criminal responsibility in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sloane, R. D. (2007). The expressive capacity of international punishment: the limits of the national law analogy and the potential of international criminal law. Stanford journal of international law, 43(1), 39–94.

Smith, S. L. (1995). Changing Corporate Environmental Behaviour: Criminal Prosecutions as a Tool of Environmental Policy. En R. Eckersley (Ed.), Markets, the State and the Environment (pp. 261–274). London: Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14022-0_11

Sousa, R. D. (1980). ARGUMENTS FROM NATURE. Zygon®, 15(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1980.tb00384.x

Stahn, C. (2020). International Criminal Justice and Expressivist Theory. En C. Stahn, Justice as Message (pp. 18–84). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198864189.003.0002

Stuntz, W. J. (2001). The Pathological Politics of Criminal Law. Michigan Law Review, 100(3), 505. https://doi.org/10.2307/1290411

Tauchen, H., Witte, A. D., & Griesinger, H. (1994). Criminal Deterrence: Revisiting the Issue with a Birth Cohort. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(3), 399. https://doi.org/10.2307/2109966

Trahan, J. (2020). Existing Legal Limits to Security Council Veto Power in the Face of Atrocity Crimes (1a ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765251

Valerius, B. (2011). Kultur und Strafrecht. Die Berücksichtigung kultureller Wertvorstellungen in der deutschen Strafrechtsdogmatik (1a ed.). Duncker & Humblot. https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-53261-2

Van Den Heede, O. (2022). Ecocide as the Fifth Core Crime in the Rome Statute. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 55(2), 435–446.

Van Den Herik, L., & Letnar Cernic, J. (2010). Regulating Corporations under International Law: From Human Rights to International Criminal Law and Back Again. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 8(3), 725–743. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq031

Ventura, M. J. (2020). Aiding and Abetting and the International Criminal Court’s Bemba et al. Case: The icc Trial and Appeals Chamber Consider Article 25(3)(c) of the Rome Statute. International Criminal Law Review, 20(6), 1138–1166. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10031

Vries, B. de. (2023). Individual criminal responsibility for autonomous weapons systems in international criminal law. Leiden ; Boston: Brill Nijhoff.

Wandesforde-Smith, G. (2016). Bracketing Braverman: Thinking and Acting for Wildlife Conservation after Nature. Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 19(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880292.2016.1167476

Watson, R. A. (1983). A Critique of Anti-Anthropocentric Biocentrism: Environmental Ethics, 5(3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics19835325

Weigend, T. (2004). Bemerkungen zur Vorgesetztenverantwortlichkeit im Völkerstrafrecht. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 116(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/zstw.2004.116.4.999

Werle, G., & Jeßberger, F. (2020). Völkerstrafrecht (5., überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

White, R. (2018). Ecocentrism and criminal justice. Theoretical Criminology, 22(3), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480618787178

White, R., & Kramer, R. C. (2015). Critical Criminology and the Struggle Against Climate Change Ecocide. Critical Criminology, 23(4), 383–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-015-9292-5

Whiting, A. (2019, abril 12). The ICC’s Afghanistan Decision: Bending to U.S. or Focusing Court on Successful Investigations? Recuperado 24 de mayo de 2024, de Just Security website: https://www.justsecurity.org/63613/the-iccs-afghanistan-decision-bending-to-u-s-or-focusing-court-on-successful-investigations/

Winter, E. (2023). Stop Ecocide International’s Blueprint for Ecocide Is Compromised by Anthropocentrism: A New Architect Must Be Found. Israel Law Review, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223722000218

Wittlin, M. (2011). Buckling Under Pressure: An Empirical Test of the Expressive Effects of Law. Yale journal on regulation, 28(2), 419–469.

Wyatt, J. (2010). Law-making at the intersection of international environmental, humanitarian and criminal law: the issue of damage to the environment in international armed conflict. International Review of the Red Cross, 92(879), 593–646. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383110000536

Jurisprudencia:

Judgment of the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal 1946. (1947). American Journal of International Law, 41(1), 172–333. https://doi.org/10.2307/2193873

Prosecutor v Bemba Gombo (Decision) ICC‐01/05‐01/08 (10 de junio 2008)

Prosecutor v. Katanga (Decision) ICC-01/04-01/07 (30 de septiembre 2008)

Prosecutor v Lubanga Dyilo (Decision) ICC-01/04-01/06 (10 de febrero 2006)

Prosecutor v Lubanga Dyilo (Decision) ICC-01/04-01/06 (07 de febrero 2007)

Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (Decision) ICC-02/17-33 (12 de abril 2019)

Otros Documentos:

Brown, G. W. (Ed.). (2018). The concise Oxford dictionary of politics and international relations: edited by Garrett Wallace Brown, Iain McLean, and Alistair McMillan (Fourth edition). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

Calvin, K., Dasgupta, D., Krinner, G., Mukherji, A., Thorne, P. W., Trisos, C., … Péan, C. (2023). IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647

IEP. (2021). Independent Expert Panel for the Legal Definition of Ecocide - Commentary and Core Text. Stop Ecocide Foundation. Recuperado de https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5ca2608ab914493c64ef1f6d/t/60d7479cf8e7e5461534dd07/1624721314430/SE+Foundation+Commentary+and+core+text+revised+%281%29.pdf

IPCC. (2022). Climate Change 2022 Mitigation of Climate Change Summary for Policymakers. IPCC.

Khan, K. A. A. (2021, septiembre 27). Statement of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Karim A. A. Khan QC, following the application for an expedited order under article 18(2) seeking authorisation to resume investigations in the Situation in Afghanistan | International Criminal Court. Recuperado 23 de mayo de 2024, de https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/statement-prosecutor-international-criminal-court-karim-khan-qc-following-application

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Program) (Ed.). (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

OECD. (2021). Managing Climate Risks, Facing up to Losses and Damages: Understanding, Reducing and Managing Risks. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/55ea1cc9-en

OECD. (2022). Fighting climate change: International attitudes toward climate policies (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No 1714). https://doi.org/10.1787/3406f29a-en

Office of the Prosecutor. (2006, septiembre 2). Letter of Prosecutor dated 9 February 2006. Recuperado de https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/NR/rdonlyres/04D143C8-19FB-466C-AB77-4CDB2FDEBEF7/143682/OTP_letter_to_senders_re_Iraq_9_February_2006.pdf

Paper on some policy issues before the Office of the Prosecutor, (2003)

https://www.icc-cpi.int/sites/default/files/NR/rdonlyres/1FA7C4C6-DE5F-42B7-8B25-60AA962ED8B6/143594/030905_Policy_Paper.pdf

Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court. (1996). Summary of the proceedings of the Preparatory Committee during the period 25 March- 12 April 1996 [UN Doc A/AC.249/1].

Rep. Schumer, Environmental Crimes Act of 1992, Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Crime and Criminal

Justice of the House Comm. on the Judiciary, 102d Cong., 2d Sess. 14 (1992)

Reservations to the Convention on Genocide, Advisory Opinion: I.C.J. Reports 1951

https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/12/012-19510528-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf

Security Council Report. (2024). The Security Council Veto. Recuperado de https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/working_methods_theveto-7.pdf

The Charter and Judgment of the Nürnberg Tribunal – History and Analysis: Memorandum submitted by the

Secretary-General, UN Doc A/CN.4/5 (1949).

UN. Ad Hoc Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court. (1995). Report of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court [UN Doc A/50/22].

Estadísticas de consulta

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Métricas de publicación

0




 

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.

Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.