Contenido principal del artículo

Yoveslav Radoslavov Yordanov

El presente trabajo examina algunas de las limitaciones jurisdiccionales que impiden a la Corte Penal Internacional ejercer de modo efectivo su competencia sobre los nacionales de Estados terceros, aun cuando el crimen se haya cometido en el territorio de un Estado Parte en el Estatuto de Roma. En su primera parte, el artículo profundiza en la inmunidad de jurisdicción penal de los agentes militares como funcionarios del Estado de la nacionalidad. En segundo lugar, analizamos la conformidad de los acuerdos del artículo 98.2 del Estatuto, también denominados Acuerdos sobre el Estatuto de las Fuerzas Armadas Extranjeras, con las disposiciones de éste, al originarse en estos casos una especie de inmunidad procesal ad hoc que condiciona la operatividad de la Corte.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Radoslavov Yordanov, Y. (2022). Los Acuerdos sobre el Estatuto de las Fuerzas Armadas Extranjeras como límite a la actividad jurisdiccional de la Corte Penal Internacional. Anuario Iberoamericano De Derecho Internacional Penal, (10). https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/anidip/a.10897

Akande, D. (2006), The Application of International Law Immunities in Prosecutions for International Crimes. En J. Harrington, M. Milde y R. Vernon (Ed.), Bringing Power to Justice?: The Prospects of the International Criminal Court, Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

_________ (2003), The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-Parties: Legal Basis and Limits, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 1(3), pp. 618-650.

Akehurst, M. (1975), The Hierarchy of the Sources of International Law, British Yearbook of International Law, 47(1), pp. 273-285.

Benzing, M. (2004), U.S. Bilateral Non-Surrender Agreements and Article 98 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court: An Exercise in the Law of Treaties, Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 8, pp. 181-236.

Berman, F. (1999), The Relationship Between the International Criminal Court and the Security Council. En H.A.M. Von Hebel, J.G. Lammers y J. Schukking (Ed.), Reflections on the International Criminal Court. Essays in Honour of Adriaan Bos, The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, Berlin: Springer, pp. 173-180.

Broomhall, B. (2003), International Justice and the International Criminal Court: Between Sovereignty and the Rule of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Crawford, J., Sands, Ph. y Wilde, R. (2003), Joint Opinion on Bilateral Immunity Agreements sought by the United States under Article 98(2) of the Statute.

Escobar Hernández, C. (2000), Las relaciones de la Corte Penal Internacional con las Naciones Unidas. En J. Quel López (Ed.), Creación de una Jurisdicción Penal Internacional, Colección Escuela Diplomática, No. 4, Madrid: AEPDIRI, BOE, pp. 31-44.

Escudero Espinosa, J.F. (2003), Los poderes del Consejo de Seguridad y la Corte Penal Internacional en el Estatuto de Roma, Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional, 19, pp. 185-261.

Fernández de Casadevante Romaní, C. (1996), La Interpretación de las Normas Internacionales, Pamplona: Aranzadi.

Fitzmaurice, G. (1957), The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law, Recueil des Cours, 92, pp. 1-227.

Gaeta, P. (2002), Official Capacity and Immunities. En A. Cassese, P. Gaeta y J.R.W.D. Jones (Ed.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. A Commentary, Vol. I, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gargiulo, P. (1999), Il controverso rapporto tra Corte penale interazionale e Consiglio di sicurezza per la repressione dei crimini di diritto interazionale, La comunità internazionale, 54(3), pp. 428-473.

__________ (1999), The Controversial Relationship Between the International Criminal Court and the Security Council. En F. Lattanzi y W.A. Schabas (Ed.), Essays on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Ripa di Fagnano Alto: II Sirente, Vol. I, pp. 67-104.

Johansen, R.C. (2006), The Impact of US Policy toward the International Criminal Court on the Prevention of Genocide, War Crimes, and Crimes against Humanity, Human Rights Quarterly, 28(2), pp. 301-331.

Kaul, H.-P. y Kress, C. (1999), Jurisdiction and Cooperation in the Statute of the International Criminal Court: Principles and Compromises, Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 2(1), pp. 143-175.

Keith Hall, C. (2000), The First Five Sessions of the UN Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court, American Journal of International Law, 94(4), pp. 773-789.

Kelsen, H. (1948-1949), Conflict between obligations under the Charter of the United Nations and obligations under other international agreements. An analysis of Article 103 of the Charter, University of Pittsburg Law Review, 10(1), pp. 284-294.

Kress, C. y Prost, K. (2016), Article 98. Cooperation with respect to waiver of immunity and consent to surrender. En O. Triffterer y K. Ambos (Ed.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. A Commentary, Baden-Baden: C.H. BECK, Hart, Nomos, 3ª ed., pp. 2117-2146.

Murphy, S.D. (2003), U.S. Bilateral Agreements Relating to ICC, American Journal of International Law, 97(1), pp. 200-203.

O’Keefe, R. (2016), Response: “Quid,” Not “Quantum”: A Comment on “How the International Criminal Court Threatens Treaty Norms, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 49(1), pp. 433-441.

Remiro Brotons, A. (1987), Derecho Internacional Público. 2. Derecho de los Tratados, Madrid: Tecnos.

Schabas, W.A. (2010), The International Criminal Court. A Commentary on the Rome Statute, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

____________ (2001), An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scheffer, D. (2005), Article 98(2) of the Rome Statute: America’s Original Intent, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 3(2), pp. 333-353.

Tan, Ch.J. (2003), The Proliferation of Bilateral Non-Surrender Agreements Among Non-Ratifiers of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, American University International Law Review, 19(5), pp. 1115-1180.

Triffterer, O. (2009), ‘Irrelevance of Official Capacity’ - Article 27 Rome Statute Undermined by Obligations under International Law or by Agreement (Article 98)? En I. Buffard, J. Crawford, A. Pellet y S. Wittch (Ed.), International Law between Universalism and Fragmentation. Festschrift in Honour of Gerhard Hafner, Leiden: Brill-Nijhoff, pp. 571-602.

Villagrán Kramer, F. (2003), Derecho de los Tratados, Guatemala: Ferg Editores, 2ª ed.

Watts, A. (1994), The Legal Position in International Law of Heads of States, Heads of Governments and Foreign Ministers, Recueil des Cours, 247, pp. 9-130.

Wirth, S. (2001), Immunities, Related Problems, and Article 98 of the Rome Statute, Criminal Law Forum, 12(4), pp. 429-458.

Wright, Q. (1917), Conflicts Between International Law and Treaties, American Journal of International Law, 11(3), pp. 566-579.

Yee, L. (1999), The International Criminal Court and The Security Council: Articles 13(b) and 16. En R.S. Lee (Ed.), The International Criminal Court. The Making of the Rome Statute, Issues, Negotiations, Results, The Hague, London, Boston: Kluwer Law International, pp. 143-152.

Zappalà, S. (2003), The Reaction of the US to the Entry into Force of the ICC Statute: Comments on UNSC Resolution 1422 (2002) and Article 98 Agreements, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 1(1), pp. 114-134.

Jurisprudencia

CPI, Sala de Apelaciones, Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Judgment on the appeal against the decision on the authorisation of an investigation into the situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, de 5 de marzo de 2020, Doc. ICC-02/17-138.

CPI, Sala de Apelaciones, The Prosecutor v. Omar Hassan Ahmad Al Bashir, Judgment in the Jordan Referral re Al-Bashir Appeal, de 6 de mayo de 2019, Doc. ICC-02/05-01/09OA2.

CPI, Fiscalía, Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, Public redacted version of “Request for authorisation of an investigation pursuant to article 15”, de 20 de noviembre de 2017, ICC-02/17-7-Conf-Exp, Doc. ICC-02/17-7-Red.

Detalles del artículo