La sociología histórica, la teoría de las relaciones internacionales y la condición imperial
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Descargas
Albert, M. (2016). A theory of world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Autesserre, S. (2010). The trouble with the Congo: local violence and the failure of international peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bayly, C. A. (2004). The birth of the modern world, 1780-1914: global connections and comparisons. Malden: Blackwell.
Blaney, D. L., & Tickner, A. B. (2017). International relations in the prison of colonial modernity. International Relations, 31(1), 71-75. Doi: https:// doi.org/10.1177/0047117817691349
Buzan, B. (2004). From international to world society? English school theory and the social structure of globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B. (2014). The ‘standard of civilisation’ as an English school concept. Millennium, 42(3), 576-594. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177% 2F0305829814528265
Buzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2015). The global transformation: history, modernity and the making of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B., & Little, R. (2001). Why international relations has failed as an intellectual project and what to do about it. Millennium, 30(1), 19-39. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010401
Darby, P. (Ed.). (1997). At the edge of international relations: post-colonialism, gender and dependency. Londres: Pinter.
Doyle, M. W. (1986). Empires. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Du Bois, W. E. B. (2007 [1903]). The souls of black folk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dunne, T., Hansen, L., & Wight, C. (2013). The end of international relations theory? European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 405-425. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485
Fanon, F. (1965). A dying colonialism. New York: Grove Press.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.
Go, J. (2011). Patterns of empire: the British and American empires, 1688 to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Go, J. (2014). Beyond metrocentrism: from empire to globalism in early ussociology. Journal of Classical Sociology, 14(2), 178-202.
González-Peláez, A. (2009). The primary institutions of the Middle Eastern regional interstate society. En B. Buzan & A. González-Peláez (Eds.), International society and the Middle East: English school theory at the regional level (pp. 92-116). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.
Hobsbawm, E. (2009). La era del imperio, 1875-1914 (6ª ed.). Buenos Aires: Crítica.
Hobson, J. M. (2012). The Eurocentric conception of world politics: Western international theory, 1760-2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). After victory: institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kedourie, E. (1997). Afghani and ‘Abduh: an essay on religious unbelief and political activism in modern islam. London: Frank Cass.
Keene, E. (2014). The Standard of ‘civilisation’, the expansion thesis and the 19th-century international social space. Millennium, 42(3), 651-673. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814541319
Kleinschmidt, J. (2018). Differentiation theory and the global South as a metageography of international relations. Alternatives, 43(2), 59-80. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375418811191
Krishna, S. (1999). Postcolonial insecurities: India, Sri Lanka, and the question of nationhood. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lapid, Y. (1989). The Third debate: on the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era. International Studies Quarterly, 33(3), 235-254. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600457
Luhmann, N. (2006). La sociedad de la sociedad. Ciudad de México: Herder.
Luhmann, N. (2009). Causalidad en el sur. Estudios Sociológicos, 27(79), 3-29.
Mazower, M. (2009). No enchanted palace: the end of empire and the ideological origins of the united Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Mearsheimer, J. J., & Walt, S. M. (2013). Leaving theory behind: why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 427-457. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1177/1354066113495485
Nadel, S. F. (1957). The theory of social structure. Illinois: Free Press.
Osterhammel, J. (2014). The transformation of the world: a global history of the nineteenth century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Owens, P. (2015). Economy of force: counterinsurgency and the historical rise of the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paoloni, A. (1999). Navigating modernity: post-colonialism, identity and international relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los derechos de autor serán de la Universidad del Rosario. Cuando el autor quiera publicar el manuscrito en otra publicación, deberá pedir a la Editorial de la Universidad del Rosario los permisos correspondientes. De igual forma, cuando la Revista esté interesada en publicar artículos que ya han sido publicados en otras revistas, procederá a solicitar los permisos correspondientes en la editorial donde se realizó la primera publicación. Bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License, los autores pueden compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.