Contenido principal del artículo


Stetter, S. (2020). La sociología histórica, la teoría de las relaciones internacionales y la condición imperial. Desafíos, 32(1), 1–23.

Albert, M. (2016). A theory of world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Autesserre, S. (2010). The trouble with the Congo: local violence and the failure of international peacebuilding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bayly, C. A. (2004). The birth of the modern world, 1780-1914: global connections and comparisons. Malden: Blackwell.

Blaney, D. L., & Tickner, A. B. (2017). International relations in the prison of colonial modernity. International Relations, 31(1), 71-75. Doi: https://

Buzan, B. (2004). From international to world society? English school theory and the social structure of globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Buzan, B. (2014). The ‘standard of civilisation’ as an English school concept. Millennium, 42(3), 576-594. Doi: 2F0305829814528265

Buzan, B., & Lawson, G. (2015). The global transformation: history, modernity and the making of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Buzan, B., & Little, R. (2001). Why international relations has failed as an intellectual project and what to do about it. Millennium, 30(1), 19-39. Doi:

Darby, P. (Ed.). (1997). At the edge of international relations: post-colonialism, gender and dependency. Londres: Pinter.

Doyle, M. W. (1986). Empires. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Du Bois, W. E. B. (2007 [1903]). The souls of black folk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dunne, T., Hansen, L., & Wight, C. (2013). The end of international relations theory? European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 405-425. Doi:

Fanon, F. (1965). A dying colonialism. New York: Grove Press.

Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.

Go, J. (2011). Patterns of empire: the British and American empires, 1688 to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Go, J. (2014). Beyond metrocentrism: from empire to globalism in early ussociology. Journal of Classical Sociology, 14(2), 178-202.

González-Peláez, A. (2009). The primary institutions of the Middle Eastern regional interstate society. En B. Buzan & A. González-Peláez (Eds.), International society and the Middle East: English school theory at the regional level (pp. 92-116). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.

Hobsbawm, E. (2009). La era del imperio, 1875-1914 (6ª ed.). Buenos Aires: Crítica.

Hobson, J. M. (2012). The Eurocentric conception of world politics: Western international theory, 1760-2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). After victory: institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kedourie, E. (1997). Afghani and ‘Abduh: an essay on religious unbelief and political activism in modern islam. London: Frank Cass.

Keene, E. (2014). The Standard of ‘civilisation’, the expansion thesis and the 19th-century international social space. Millennium, 42(3), 651-673. Doi:

Kleinschmidt, J. (2018). Differentiation theory and the global South as a metageography of international relations. Alternatives, 43(2), 59-80. Doi:

Krishna, S. (1999). Postcolonial insecurities: India, Sri Lanka, and the question of nationhood. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Lapid, Y. (1989). The Third debate: on the prospects of international theory in a post-positivist era. International Studies Quarterly, 33(3), 235-254. Doi:

Luhmann, N. (2006). La sociedad de la sociedad. Ciudad de México: Herder.

Luhmann, N. (2009). Causalidad en el sur. Estudios Sociológicos, 27(79), 3-29.

Mazower, M. (2009). No enchanted palace: the end of empire and the ideological origins of the united Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Mearsheimer, J. J., & Walt, S. M. (2013). Leaving theory behind: why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 427-457. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1177/1354066113495485

Nadel, S. F. (1957). The theory of social structure. Illinois: Free Press.

Osterhammel, J. (2014). The transformation of the world: a global history of the nineteenth century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Owens, P. (2015). Economy of force: counterinsurgency and the historical rise of the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Paoloni, A. (1999). Navigating modernity: post-colonialism, identity and international relations. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.