Contenido principal del artículo

Felipe Jaramillo Ruiz

Gendered quotas have been one of the preferred instruments for promoting women’s participation and empowerment in public decision-making positions. This study analyzes Colombia’s constitutional validation of gender quotas. It examines how ideas of merit were articulated in favor and against the enactment of gender quotas. In doing so, it argues that the centrality of merit in the constitutional debate on gender quotas is fundamentally flawed, for it ignores the subjective nature of merit, limiting the type of experiences and potential that matter in democratic representation. From this perspective, the primary idea that men and women need to show that they ‘deserve’ to occupy representative positions undermines feminist critique on representation. In this sense, the article contributes to the debate on women’s global leadership by revealing the risks of merit-driven arguments for advancing women’s democratic representation.


Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.
Jaramillo Ruiz, F. (2019). Colombia’s Constitutional Debate on Gender Quotas: The Link between Representation, Merit, and Democracy. Desafíos, 31(1), 19-44.

Agustin, L. R., Siim, B. & Borchorst, A. (2018). Gender equality without gender quotas. In É. Lépinard & R. Rubio-Marin (Eds.), Transforming gender citizenship (pp. 400-423). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Araujo, C. (1998). Mulheres e representação política: A experiência das cotas no Brasil. Revista Estudos Feministas 6(4), 71-91. Retrieved from

Araujo, C. (2003). Quotas for women in the Brazilian legislative system. Paper presented at the International idea Workshop. The implementation of Quotas: Latin American Experiences. Retrieved from

Baldez, L. (2004). Elected bodies: The gender quota law for legislative candidates in Mexico. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29(2), 231-58. Doi:

Bernal Olarte, A. & Wills, M. E. (2003). Mujeres y política: ¿en qué punto estamos? In G. Hoskin, R. Masias Nuñez & M. Garcia Sanchez (Eds.), Elecciones, comportamiento electoral y democracia (pp. 143-92). Bogotá: Uniandes.

Boldeon Gonzalez, E. (2010). Leyes de igualdad en Europa y transformaciones de la ciudadanía. In D. Heim & E. Boledón (Coords.), Derecho, género e igualdad: Cambios en las estructuras jurídicas androcéntricas (pp. 9-26). Barcelona: Grupo Antígona.

Boucher, J. (2003). Male power and contract theory: Hobbes and Locke in Carole Pateman’s “The sexual contract”. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue canadienne de science politique, 36(1), 23-38. Doi:

Bruhn, K. (2003). Whores and lesbians: Political activism, party strategies, and gender quotas in Mexico. Electoral Studies, 22(1), 101-19. Doi:

Bush, S. S. (2011). International politics and the spread of quotas for women in legislatures. International Organization, 65(1), 103-37. Doi:

Carrio, E. M. (2005). Argentina: A new look at the challenges of women’s participation in the legislature. In J. Ballington & A. Karam (Eds.), Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers (pp. 164-73). Stockholm: International idea.

Casey, C., Skibnes, R. & Pringle, J. K. (2011). Gender equality and corporate governance: Policy strategies in Norway and New Zealand. Gender, Work & Organization, 18(6), 613-30. Doi:

Celis, K., Childs, S., Kantola, J. & Krook, M. L. (2008). Rethinking women’s substantive representation. Journal of Representative Democracy, 44(2), 99-110. Doi:

Childs, S. & Dahlerup, D. (2018). Increasing women’s descriptive representation in national parliaments: The involvement and impact of gender and politics scholars. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1-2): 185-204. Doi:

Corkery, J. F., Taylor, M. E. & Hayden, M. (2018). Gender balance in Australian boardrooms. In M. Aluchna & G. Aras (Eds.), Women on corporate boards. An international perspective (pp. 69-89). New York: Routledge.

Dahlerup, D. (2013). Women, quotas and politics. New York: Routledge.

Dassonneville, R. & McAllister, I. (2018). Gender, political knowledge, and descriptive representation: The impact of long-term socialization. American Journal of Political Science, 62(2), 249-65. Doi:

Espirito-Santo, A., Freire, A. & Serra-Silva, S. (2018). Does women’s descriptive representation matter for policy preferences? The role of political parties. Party Politics. Doi:

Franceschet, S. & Piscopo, J. (2008). Gender quotas and women’s substantive representation: Lessons from Argentina. Politics & Gender, 4(03), 393-425. Doi:

Gray, T. (2003). Electoral gender quotas: Lessons from Argentina and Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 22(1), 52-78. Doi:

Gray, T. (2015). Quota mechanics in Panamá, 1999-2014: “Se obedece, pero no se cumple”. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 34(3), 289-304. Doi:

Guzmán, D. E. & Prieto, S. (2011). Participación política de las mujeres y partidos. Posi-bilidades a partir de la reforma política de 2011. Bogotá. Retrieved from

Hinojosa, M. & Vijil Gurdian, A. (2012). Alternate paths to power? Women’s political representation in Nicaragua. Latin American Politics and Society, 54(4), 61-88. Doi:

Hoecker, B. & Fuchs, G. (2004). Without women merely a half-democracy: The political participation of women in East European accession states. International Policy Analysis Unit, 1-18.

Hughes, M. M., Krook, M. L. & Paxton, P. (2015). Transnational women’s activism and the global diffusion of gender quotas. International Studies Quarterly, 59(2), 357-72. Doi:

Inglehart, R., Norris, P. & Welzel, C. (2002). Gender equality and democracy. Comparative Sociology, 1(3), 321-45. Doi:

International idea (2018). Gender quotas database. Retrieved from: https://

Jaramillo Ruiz, F. & Erazo, A. C. (2016). Gender equality as a general interest of a pluralistic society: An analysis of constitutional precedent in Colombia. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 35(2), 178–190. Doi:

Jaramillo Ruiz, F. & Monroy, M. C. (2015). Paridad democrática por fuera de las urnas. Una aproximación a la participación de las mujeres en la administración pública en Colombia. Revista Ópera, 16(16), 35-53. Doi:

Jones, M. P. (2009). Gender quotas, electoral laws, and the election of women: Evidence from the Latin American vanguard. Comparative Political Studies, 42(1), 56-81. Doi:

Krook, M. L. (2007). Candidate gender quotas: A framework for analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 367-94. Doi:

Krook, M. L. (2010). Quotas for women in politics: Gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.

Martin, D. J. (2018). Playing the women’s card: How women respond to female candidates’ descriptive versus substantive representation. American Politics Research, 1-33. Doi:

Mills, C. W. & Pateman, C. (2011). Contract theory and global change: The intersections of gender, race and class. In A. G. Jónasdóttir, V. Bryson & K. B. Jones (Eds.), Sexuality, gender and power: Intersectional and transnational perspectives (pp.113-26). New York: Routledege.

Montaño, S. & Rico, M. N. (2007). Women’s contribution to equality in Latin America and the Caribbean. eclac. Retrieved from ?sequence=


Murray, R., Krook, M. L. & Opello, K. (2012). Why are gender quotas adopted? Party pragmatism and parity in France. Political Research Quarterly, 65(3), 529-43. Doi:

Pateman, C. (1989). The disorder of women: Democracy, feminism and political theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Paxton, P. & Hughes, M. (2015). The increasing effectiveness of national gender quotas, 1990-2010. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 40(3), 331-62. Doi:

Piscopo, J. M. (2015). States as Gender Equality Activists: The Evolution of Quota laws in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society 57(3), 27-49. Doi:

Prokhovnik, R. (1998). Public and private citizenship: From gender invisibility to feminist inclusiveness. Feminist Review, 60(1), 84-104. Doi:

Rodriguez Valero, L. A. (2013). La representación sustantiva de las mujeres en el congreso colombiano, de 1998 al 2012: Una visión más allá del número total de legisladoras. Serie Documentos del Departamento de Ciencia Política 21.

Rodriguez-Ruiz, B. & Rubio-Marin, R. (2008). The gender of representation: On democracy, equality, and parity. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 6(2), 287-316. Doi:

Rubio-Marin, R. (2012). A new European parity-democracy sex equality model and why it won’t fly in the United States. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 60(1), 99-126. Doi:

Sagot, M. (2010). Does the political participation of women matter? Democratic representation, affirmative action and quotas in Costa Rica. IDS bulletin, 41(5), 25-34. Doi:

Siim, B. (2000). Gender and citizenship. Politics and agency in France, Britain and

Denmark, Singapore. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Swers, M. L. (2005). Connecting descriptive and substantive representation:

An analysis of sex differences in cosponsorship activity. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30(3), 407-33. Doi:

Towns, A. E. (2010). Women and states: Norms and hierarchies in international society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tripp, A. M. & Kang, A. (2008). The global impact of quotas: On the fast track to increased female legislative representation. Comparative Political Studies, 41(3), 338-61. Doi:

United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (2004). General recommendation 25, on Article 4, Paragraph 1, of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, on Temporary Special Measures. New York.

Wills Obregon, M. E. & Cardozo García, F. (2010). Los partidos colombianos y la representación de las mujeres (1990-2006) ¿Compromiso de fondo o superficial? Colombia Internacional, (71), 127-49. Doi:

Young, I. M. (2002). Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Zetterberg, P. (2009). Do gender quotas foster women’s political engagement? Lessons from Latin America. Political Research Quarterly, 62(4), 715-30. Doi:

Detalles del artículo