Jurisdictional Consequences Associated with the Multiplication of International Tribunals: What Are the Potential Risks?

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/acdi9.1.2016.01

Article Sidebar

pdf (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) Lector Inteligente (Español (España)) ePub (Español (España))

Published: Jan 15, 2016
Issue: Vol. 9 (2016): ACDI
Section Papers


Keywords: multiplication of international courts and tribunals fragmentation multiple proceedings

Main Article Content

Authors

Carlos Bellei Tagle
Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Chile

Abstract

The dispute resolution system is an essential aspect in order to grant efficacy to international law. In recent years various transformations have been tried, the most significant of which are the multiplication of international courts and tribunals. This work explores the different effects this result has generated, concentrating on some considered negative. Likewise, it reviews different alternatives that have arisen to mitigate the jurisdictional risks occasioned by the explosive increase in organs of adjudication.

Author Biography

Carlos Bellei Tagle, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Chile

Abogado de la Universidad de Chile y llm en Solución de Controversias Internacionales, Universidad de Ginebra y Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies. Se desempeña actualmente como profesor de Derecho Internacional en la Universidad Alberto Hurtado, en Chile

How to Cite
Bellei Tagle, C. (2016). Jurisdictional Consequences Associated with the Multiplication of International Tribunals: What Are the Potential Risks?. ACDI - Anuario Colombiano De Derecho Internacional, 9, 17–49. https://doi.org/10.12804/acdi9.1.2016.01
References

Aznar Gómez, Mariano J., “En torno a la unidad sistémica del derecho internacional”, Revista Española de Derecho Internacional, 2007, lix (2), pp. 563-594.

Böhm, María Laura, “Informe del x Encuentro del Grupo Latinoamericano de Estudios sobre Derecho Penal Internacional”, en Ambos, Kai et al. (Eds.), Análisis de la primera sentencia de la Corte Penal Internacional: el caso Lubanga, Fundación Konrad Adenauer, 2014, pp. 457-473.

Buergenthal, Thomas, “Proliferation of international courts and tribunals: is good or bad?”, Leiden Journal of International Law, 2001, 14, (2), pp. 267-275.

Cheng, Bing, General principles of law as applied by international courts and tribunals, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006.

Dodge, William, “National courts and international arbitration: exhaustion of local remedies and res judicata under chapter eleven of NAFTA”, Hasting International and Comparative Law Review, 2000, 23, (1), pp. 357-384.

Dupuy, Pierre-Marie, “The danger of fragmentation or unification of the international legal system and the International Court of Justice”, Journal of International Law and Politics, 1999, 31, (4), pp. 791-807.

Fernández Liesa, Carlos R., “La proliferación de tribunales internacionales en el espacio iberoamericano”, Revista Electrónica de Derecho Iberoamericana, 2008, 2, (2), pp. 11-22.

Guillaume, Gilbert, “Speech to the General Assembly of the United Nations”, 2001, en http://www.icj-cij.org/court/index.php?pr=82&pt=3&p1=1&p2=3&p3=1&phpsessid=

Lauterpacht, Hersch, The development of international law by the International Court of Justice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1958.

Lauterpacht, Hersch, The function of law in the international community (introduction Martii Koskenniemi), Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011.

Reinisch, August, “The use and abuse of res judicata and lis pendens as procedural tools to avoid conflicting dispute settlement outcomes”,The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 2004, 3, (1), pp. 37-77.

Remiro Brotóns, Antonio et al., Derecho internacional, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2007.

Rodiles, Alejandro, “La fragmentación del derecho internacional: ¿riesgo u oportunidad para México?”, Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional, 2009, ix, pp. 373-413.

Romano, Cesare, “The proliferation of international judicial bodies: the pieces of the puzzle”, Journal of International Law and Politics, 1999, 31, (4), pp. 709-751.

Schwebel, Stephen M., “Address to the General Assembly of the United Nations”, 1998, en http://www.icjcij.org/presscom/files/7/3007.pdf

Shany, Yuval, The competing jurisdiction of international courts and tribunals, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.

Study Group of the International Law Commission, “Fragmentation of international law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law”, Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission finalized by Martii Koskenniemiz A/CN.4/L.682, 2006.

Query Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Publcation metrics

1342 998




 

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.