Main Article Content

Authors

This article studies the behavior of resistance and backlash against the judgments of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, its effects on the authority of the Court and the means chosen by the States to oppose the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. The article proposes an adaptation to the Inter-American System of the categories of resistance and backlash, used to study other international Courts and Tribunals, that accounts for the legality or illegality of the conducts that oppose the effectiveness of the System, from the viewpoint of rights and prerogatives that the States have in the American Convention. Subsequently, the article studies 11 cases of opposition to the Inter-American System and classifies them according to the legality of the means used by the States, ranging from abusing procedural rights, to wrongfully invoking their constitutional law in order to avoid their international obligations. Finally, the article analyzes the legality, procedure, and effects of the acts of recusation of judges recently carried out by the Colombian agents in the “Bedoya Lima” case and proposes to categorize them according to their consequences in the authority of the Inter-American system.

Arévalo Ramírez, W., & Rousset Siri, A. (2023). Resistance and backlash against the judgments of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Study of 11 cases of Reactions of the States against the authority of the Court and the recusation of judges in the “Bedoya Lima” case. ACDI - Anuario Colombiano De Derecho Internacional, 16(16), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/acdi/a.12687

Abello‐Galvis, Ricardo y Walter Arévalo‐Ramírez. “Inter‐American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC‐23/17: Jurisdictional, Pro-cedural and Substantive Implications of Human Rights Duties in the Context of Environmental Protection”. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 28, no. 2 (2019): 217-222. http s://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12290

Allori, Agostina. “Resisting the Resistance: Dialogues Between the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the Higher National Courts (The Cases of the Dominican Republic and Argentina)”. PluriCourts Research Paper Forthcoming, (2020): 1-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3733353

Alter, Karen, James Gathii y Laurence Helfer. “Backlash against Interna-tional Courts in West, East and southern Africa: Causes and Con-sequences”. European Journal of International Law 27, no. 2 (2016): 293-328. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil /chw 019

Alter, Karen, Laurence Helfer y Mikael Rask Madsen. “How Context Shapes the Authority of International Courts”. Law & Contemporary Problems 79, no. 1 (2016):1-36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43920643

Arévalo‐Ramírez, Walter. “Resistance to Territorial and Maritime Delimi-tation Judgments of the International Court of Justice and Clashes with ‘Territory Clauses’ in the Constitutions of Latin American States”. Leiden Journal of International Law 35, no. 1 (2021): 185-208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S09221565210 0 0522

Arévalo-Ramírez, Walter y Tania Bonilla-Matiz. “Responsabilidad interna-cional del Estado por hechos internacionalmente ilícitos, obligaciones internacionales emanadas del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos y procesos de justicia transicional: entre el cumplimiento y la colisión”. En Reflexiones sobre el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, editado por Carlos Mauricio López Cárdenas, 1-52. Bogotá: Universidad del Rosario, 2020.

Arévalo‐Ramírez, Walter y Andrés Rousset. “Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (iachr) and Inter-American Court of Human Rights (iacthr)”. En Oxford Bibliographies in International Law, edita-do por Tony Carty, 1-15. Nueva York: Oxford University Press, 2021.

Cavallaro, James L., Stephanie Erin Brewer. “The Virtue of Following: The Role of Inter-American Litigation in Campaigns for Social Justice”. Sur. Revista Internacional de Direitos Humanos 5, (2008): 84-95.

Contesse, Jorge. “Case of Barrios Altos and La Cantuta v. Peru”. American Journal of International Law 113, no. 3 (2019): 568-574. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2019.28

Contesse, Jorge. “Resisting the Inter-American Human Rights System”. Yale Journal of International Law 44, (2019): 179-186. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/6734

Fundación para la Libertad de Prensa – flip. “Colombia Revictimizes and Impedes Access to Justice for Jineth Bedoya”. News. flip, marzo 16, 2021. https://flip.org.co/index.php/en/public-statements/item/2688-colombia-revictimizes-and-impedes-access-to-justice-for-jineth-bedoya

Gilmour, Andrew. The global backlash against human rights. Edited text of a lecture by Andrew Gilmour, United Nations Assistant Secretary-General for Human Rights, University of California, Berkeley and McGeorge School of Law. Sacramento: unohchr, 2018. https://www.ohchr.org/en/statements/2018/06/global-backlash-against-human-rights

Huneeus, Alexandra. “Courts Resisting Courts: Lessons from the Inter-American Court’s Struggle to Enforce Human Rights”. Cornell International Law Journal 44, no. 3 (2011). https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cilj/vol44/iss3/2Madsen, Mikael Rask. International Court Authority. Oxford University Press, 2018.

Madsen, Mikael Rask, Pola Cebulak y Micha Wiebusch. “Backlash against International Courts: Explaining the Forms and Patterns of Resistan-ce to International Courts”. International Journal of Law in Context 14, no. 2 (2018): 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000034

Márquez Luzardo, Carmen María. “La denuncia de la Convención Ame-ricana sobre Derechos Humanos y otros casos paradigmáticos. Los precedentes de: Trinidad y Tobago; Perú y Venezuela”. Cuestiones Jurídicas 8, no. 1 (2016): 27-56. http://uruojs.insiemp.com/ojs/index.php/cj/article/view/210

Morales Antoniazzi, Mariela y Silivia Steininger. “Once More on Judicial Resilience: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Responds to the Revictimizing Challenge of Colombia in the Case of Jineth Be-doya Lima and Other”. Opinio Juris, abril 1, 2021. http://opiniojuris.org/2021/04/01/once-more-on-judicial-resilience-the-inter-american-court-of-human-rights-responds-to-the-revictimizing-challenge-of-colombia-in-the-case-of-jineth-bedoya-lima-and-other/

Paúl, Álvaro. “¿Una Paradoja Interamericana? Chile, un Estado que cumple las Sentencias del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, pero que Impulsa su Reforma”. Revista de Investigações Constitucionais7, no. 1 (2020): 59-85. https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v7i1.70231

Paúl, Álvaro. “El relato de los contextos históricos, sociales y políticos en las sentencias de la Corte Interamericana”. Anuario Colombiano de De-recho Internacional – acdi 13, (2020): 19-46. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/acdi/a.7647

Rousset, Andrés. “La Corte de la Nación, en principio, es Suprema. Im-plicancias del fallo de la Corte Suprema en el caso Fontevecchia”. En Informe anual 2017. Situación de los derechos humanos en Mendoza,editado por González M. Evangelista y Bernardo Germán Pascale, 403-417. Mendoza: “xumek” Asociación para la promoción y pro-tección de los derechos humanos, 2018.

Sarmiento-Lamus, Andrés y Walter Arévalo-Ramírez. “Non-Appearance before the International Court of Justice and the Role and Function of Judges ad hoc”. The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tri-bunals 16, no. 3 (2017): 398-412. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341358

Soley, Ximena y Silvia Steininger. “Parting Ways or Lashing Back? With-drawals, Backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights”. International Journal of Law in Context 14, no. 2 (2018): 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000058

von Bogdandy, Armin e Ingo Venzke. “On the Functions of International Courts: An Appraisal in Light of Their Burgeoning Public Autho-rity”. Leiden Journal of International Law 26, no. 1 (2013): 49-72. htt ps://doi.org/10.1017/S09221565120 0 06 47

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)