The Evidentiary Issue of Unwillingness When the National Decision Was Made for the Purpose of Shielding the Person from International Criminal Responsibility

DOI:  https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/acdi/a.10036

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) Lector Inteligente (Español (España)) ePub (Español (España))

Published: Feb 4, 2021
Issue: Vol. 14 (2021): ACDI preprint
Section Papers


Keywords: evidence unwillingness genuineness

Main Article Content

Authors

Juan Sebastián Vera Sánchez
Universidad de Chile

Abstract

This paper tries to offer an “evidentiary” perspective of “unwillingness”
when a State has had the purpose of shielding a person from
his/her international crimes responsibility, as an exceptional hypothesis
that allows the admissibility of the case by the International Criminal
Court (icc), in the rectification of the complementary principle. An
attempt will be made to apply Susan Haack’s fundaherentist epistemological
theory to generate an objective analysis for applying indicators
that scholars and jurisprudence have developed to know when a judicial
procedure is not genuine.

Author Biography

Juan Sebastián Vera Sánchez, Universidad de Chile

Doctor en Derecho Universidad de Barcelona. Profesor Asistente de Derecho procesal, Universidad de Chile

How to Cite
Vera Sánchez, J. S. (2021). The Evidentiary Issue of Unwillingness When the National Decision Was Made for the Purpose of Shielding the Person from International Criminal Responsibility. ACDI - Anuario Colombiano De Derecho Internacional, 14, 223–256. https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/acdi/a.10036
References

Brighton, Claire. “Avoiding Unwillingness: Addressing the Political Pitfalls Inherent in the Complementarity Regime of the Inter-national Criminal Court”. International Criminal Law Review12(4) (2012): 629-664.

Cárdenas, Claudia. “La cooperación de los Estados con la Corte Penal Internacional a la luz del principio de complementariedad”. Revista de Derecho pucv1(34) (2010): 281-304.

Carter, Linda. “The Principle of Complementarity and the International Criminal Court: The Role of Ne Bis in Idem”. Santa Clara Journal of International Law8(1) (2010): 165-198.

Chung, Chang-Ho. “The International Criminal Court 20 years after Rome–Achievements and deficits”. En The International Criminal Court in Turbulent Times, editado por Gerhard Werle y Andreas Zimmermann, 9-22. The Hague: tmc Asser Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-303-0_2

Dalpe, Vincent. “On the Difficult Case for a Functional Interpretation of the Unwillingness Criterion before the International Criminal Cou r t ”. Journal of International Law and International Relations13(2) (2 017 ): 4 8 - 82 .

Daza, Alfonso. El principio de complementariedad en el derecho penal internacio-nal. Bogotá: Universidad Católica de Colombia, 2015.

Ellis, Mark. “The International Criminal Court and Its Implication for Domestic Law and National Capacity Building”. Florida Journal of International Law15(2) (2002): 215-242.

El Zeidy, Mohamed. The principle of complementarity in International Criminal Law. Martinus Nijhoff publisher, 2008.Ferrer, Jordi. La valoración racional de la prueba. Marcial Pons, 2007.

Finlay, Lorraine. “Does the International Criminal Court Protect against Double Jeopardy: An Analysis of Article 20 of the Rome Statute,” uc Davis Journal of International Law & Policy15(2) (2009): 221-248.

Fuentes, Ximena. “El principio de complementariedad en la práctica de la Corte Penal Internacional”. Estudios Internacionales 169, (2 011): 119 -14 0.

Haack, Susan. “Of Truth, in Science and in Law”. Brooklyn Law Review73(3) (2008): 985-1008. https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bl r/vol73/iss3/6

Haack, Susan. “Defending Science-Within Reason”. Principia 2(3) (1999): 187-211.Haack, Susan. “Federal Philosophy of Science: A Deconstruction and a Reconstruction”. New York University Journal of Law and Liberty5(2) (2010): 394-435.

Haack, Susan. “Proving Causation: The Holism of Warrant and the Atomism of Daubert”. Journal of Health and Biomedical Law, (4) (2008): 253-258.

Holmes, John T. “Complementarity: National vs. The icc”. En The Rome statute of the International Criminal Court, editado por Antonio Cassese, Paola Gaeta y John R. W. D. Jones, 1:667-686. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Kress, Claus. “The Procedural Law of the International Criminal Court in Outline: Anatomy of a Unique Compromise”. Journal of Interna-tional Criminal Justice1(3) (2003): 603-617.

Llewellyn, Jennifer J. “A Comment on the Complementary Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court: Adding Insult to Injury in Transitional Contexts”. Dalhousie Law Journal24(2) (2001): 192-217.

McKeon, Patricia A. “An International Criminal Court: Balancing the Principle of Soveriegnty against the Demands for International Justice”. St. John’s Journal of Legal Commentary12(2) (1997): 535-564.

Nieva, Jordi. La cosa juz gada. Atelier, 2006.Oficina de la Fiscalía, Corte Penal Internacional. Documento de política general sobre exámenes preliminares. 2013. https://www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/otp/OTP-Policy-Paper-on-Preliminary-Examinations—November2013-SPA.pdf

Olásolo, Héctor. “Admisibilidad de situaciones y casos objeto de proce-sos de justicia de transición ante la corte penal internacional”. En Ensayos de Derecho penal y procesal internacional, editado por Jessica Almqvist y Carlos Espósito, 255-289. Tirant lo Blanch, 2011.

Quesada, Carmen. “Levantando el velo de la lucha contra la impunidad: la corte penal internacional y sus intereses para actuar”. En Actores internacionales contemporáneos, editado por Mónica Rocha, Carmen Quesada y Mario Iván Ureña, 225-256. Tirant lo Blanch, 2019.

Radbruch,Gustav. “Gesetzliches Unrecht und übergesetzliches Recht”. Süddeutsche Juristen-Zeitung1(5) (1946): 105-108.

Radbruch, Gustav. Introducción a la Filosofía del derecho. Traducido por Wen-ceslao Roces. México D. F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1951.Reino Unido. Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/33/contents

Schabas, Williams & El Zeidy, Mohamed. “Art.17”. En The Rome statute of The International Criminal Court, editado por Otto Triffterer y Kai Ambos, 782-832. Berlin: Beck/Hart, 2016.

Sternberg, Mark. “A Comparison of the Yugoslavian and Rwandan War Crimes Tribunals: Universal Jurisdiction and the Elementary Dictates of Humanity”. Brooklyn Journal of International Law 22 (1996 ): 111.

Stigen, Jo. The relationship between the international criminal court and national jurisdictions. Martinus Nijhoff Publisher, 2008.

Taruffo, Michele. Simplemente la verdad: el juez y la construcción de los hechos. Traducido por Daniela Accantino Scagliotti. Marcial Pons, 2010.

Theofanis, Rosa. “The doctrine of res judicata in international criminal law ”. International Criminal Law Review, (3) (2003): 195-216.Twining, William. Rethinking Evidence. Cambridge University Press, 2006.

van der Vyver, Johan D. “Personal and Territorial Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court”. Emory International Law Review14(1) (2000): 1-104.

von Savigny,Friedrich. System des heutigen Römischen Rechts. Sechster Band. Bei Veit und Comp., 1847.

Werle, Gerhard & Zimmermann, Andreas. “Introduction”. En The Inter-national Criminal Court in Turbulent Times, editado por Gerhard Werle y Andreas Zimmermann, 1-8. The Hague: tmc Asser Press, 2019.

Wolffhügel, Christian. “La falta de disposición y de capacidad de los sistemas judiciales domésticos, en el marco del principio de com-plementariedad. A propósito del Estatuto de la Corte Penal Inter-nacional”. Civilizar. Ciencias Sociales y Humanas9(17 ) (2 0 0 9):79 - 8 8 . https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=100212301006

Documentos(1995)

Reporte del Comité ad hoc para la elabaración del Estatuto de la Corte Penal Internacional.

Query Statistics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Publcation metrics

598 84




 

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo y la publicación inicial en esta revista.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.