Main Article Content

Authors

This article is divided into three main parts. The fi rst part presents the precedents in the case relating to delimiting the Caribbean Sea boundary between Nicaragua and Colombia. It analyzes the competence of the International Court of Justice – ICJ (the Court) in accordance with Article 36 of the Statute of the Court; consequently, it studies the Declaration of the acceptance of the Competence of the Court presented by Colombia to the Permanent Court of International Justice in 1937 as well as the Bogota Pact of 1948 as to its applicability and breadth as regards the 1928 EsguerraBárcenas Treaty. The second part presents a detailed analysis of the decision of the Court on the preliminary exceptions in which it was determined that the sovereignty of the islands of San Andres, Providencia, and Santa Catalina was Colombian, that the Esguerra-Bárcenas Treaty was not treaty delimiting maritime boundaries and that it (the Court) was competent to get to the foundation of the matter. The third part sets out the actions which still must be completed relative to the foundation of the case.
Nieto Navia, R. (2010). The decision of the International Court of Justice related to preliminary exceptions in the Nicaragua v. Colombia case. ACDI - Anuario Colombiano De Derecho Internacional, 2. Retrieved from https://revistas.urosario.edu.co/index.php/acdi/article/view/1099

Tratados Carta de las Naciones Unidas.

Convención de Viena sobre el Derecho de los Tratados de 1969.

Estatuto de la Corte Internacional de Justicia.

Documentos Documentos ofi ciales, Documentos de la Conferencia, A/CONF.39/11/Add.2, p. 75). ILC, Yearbook 1974, vol. II, part. 1.

IX International Conference of American States, Acts and documents of the sessions of the Committee III, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Colombia, Bogotá 1953, vol. IV.

Libro blanco sobre el caso de San Andrés y Providencia, Managua, 1980.

Memoria de Relaciones Exteriores de 1968-1969, Bogotá, 1970.

Memoria de Relaciones Exteriores de 1969-1970, Bogotá, 1971.

Memoria de Relaciones Exteriores de 1978-1979, Bogotá 1979.

Reglamento de la Corte Internacional de Justicia.

Jurisprudencia

Arbitration Tribunal for the Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary Guinea-Bissau -- Senegal, Award of 31 July 1989, Geneva 1989.

Border and transborder armed actions (Nicaragua v. Honduras), Jurisdiction and admissibility, Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1988.

Case of the monetary gold removed from Rome in 1943 (Preliminary Question), Judgment 15 June 1954, ICJ Reports 1954.

ICJ, Fixing of time-limits for the fi ling of the Counter-memorial of Colombia, 11 February 2008, Territorial and Maritime Dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia).

ICJ, Territorial and maritime dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras), Judgment of 8 october 2007.

Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria), Preliminary objections, ICJ Reports, 1998.

Memorial of the Government of Nicaragua, 28 April 2003, (“Nicaraguan Memorial” o “Memorial”).

Military and Paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States), Jurisdiction and Admissibility, ICJ Reports, 1984.

Nicaragua, Application instituting Proceedings fi led in the Registry of the Court on 6 December 2001, (“Demanda”).

Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1974; (New Zealand v. France), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 1974, para.30).

Decisión sobre excepciones.

Territorial and maritime dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Order fi xing time. Limits for the counter-memorial of Colombia, 12 February 2008.

Territorial and maritime dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Order of 24 september 2003, I.C.J. Reports 2003.

Territorial and maritime dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Preliminary objections, 13 december 2007, Judgment (“Decisión sobre excepciones”).

Territorial and maritime dispute (Nicaragua v. Colombia), Written statement of the Government of Nicaragua, vol. I, [“Respuesta de Nicaragua”].

Doctrina

Andaluz Vegacenteno, H., “El derecho de la sucesión de Estados”, Universidad Javeriana, 9 International Law, Bogotá 2007.

Andrés Sáenz de Santa María, M. P., “Problemas actuales de la sucesión de Estados”, Universidad del País Vasco, Cursos de Derecho Internacional de Vitoria-Gasteiz, 1993, 1994.

Ayala Jiménez, A., El Caribe. Mar interior de las Américas (tesis), Bogotá, 1978.

Blanc Altemir, A., La herencia soviética, La Comunidad de Estados Independientes y los problemas sucesorios, Madrid, 2004.

Brownlie, Ian, Principles of Public International Law, Oxford 1998.

C.T. Oliver, “The monetary gold decision in perspective”, 49 AJIL (1955).

Cavelier y A. Lozano Simonelli, El ataque de Nicaragua a la soberanía colombiana, Bogotá, 2004.

Craven, M., “The International law of State succesion”, 2 International Law Forum 2000.

Crawford, J., “State practice and international law in relation to successions”, 68 B.Y.I.L. 1999.

Díez de Velasco, M., Instituciones de derecho internacional público, Madrid, 2007.

Gaviria Liévano, Enrique, Los archipiélagos de Estado en el Derecho del Mar (El Caso de San Andrés y Providencia), Bogotá, 2008.

Gaviria Liévano, Enrique, Nuestro Archipiélago de San Andrés y la Mosquitia Colombiana, Bogotá, 1984.

Gonçalves Pereira, A., La succession d’Etats en matière de traités, Paris, 1969.

Gutiérrez Espada, Cesáreo, “Sucesión de Estados en materia de tratados”, Pérez Gonxález, M. (coord.), Hacia un nuevo orden internacional europeo: estudios en homenaje al profesor don Manuel Díez De Velasco, Madrid 1993.

Lleras “Informe sobre la Novena Conferencia Internacional de Estados Americanos”, Anales de la Organización de los Estados Americanos, Vol. 1, No. 1, Unión Panamericana, Washington D.C., 1949.

López Martín, A. G., “La reafi rmación de la regla de la continuidad en los tratados de fronteras, R.E.D.I. 1997.

Lozano, San Andrés y Providencia, La amenaza de Nicaragua, Bogotá, 2002.

M. G. Monroy Cabra, El diferendo entre Colombia y Nicaragua sobre el Archipiélago de San Andrés y Providencia, Bogotá, 2006.

Moyano Bonilla, El Archipiélago de San Andrés y Providencia, Bogotá, 1983.

Parsons, J.J., San Andrés y Providencia, Bogotá, 1964, originalmente publicada en inglés en Berkeley y los Ángeles, 1956.

Pasos Argüello, L., Enclave colonialista en Nicaragua, Diferendo de Nicaragua y Colombia, Managua 1978.

Quintana, J.J., El procedimiento contencioso ante la Corte Internacional de Justicia, Bogotá, 2001.

Rivas, R., Historia diplomática de Colombia (1810-1934), Bogotá, 1961.

Rosenne, S., The World Court, What it is and how it works, Unitar sixth ed., Leiden 2003.

Shaw, M. N., International law, Cambridge, 2003.

Thirlway, H.W.A., “Preliminary objections”, R. Bernhardt (ed.) Encyclopedia of Public International Law, vol. III (1997).

Uribe Vargas et al., Mares de Colombia, Bogotá, 200, y R. Nieto Navia, Delimitación de áreas marinas y submarinas, curso dictado en Castellón en el año 2006 (en prensa).

Vázquez Carrizosa, Quitasueño, Roncador y Serrana, Bogotá, 1974.

Zamora, Intereses territoriales de Nicaragua, Managua, 1995.

Páginas web Odriozola Mariscal, C.E., Tratados y sucesión de Estados, consultado en http://www.odriozola.com.mx/IMG/pdf/TRATADOS_Y_SUCESION.pdf.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.